These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15505037)

  • 1. Psychometric properties of the Veterans Affairs Low-Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire.
    Stelmack JA; Szlyk JP; Stelmack TR; Demers-Turco P; Williams RT; Moran D; Massof RW
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Nov; 45(11):3919-28. PubMed ID: 15505037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring outcomes of vision rehabilitation with the Veterans Affairs Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire.
    Stelmack JA; Szlyk JP; Stelmack TR; Demers-Turco P; Williams RT; Moran D; Massof RW
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3253-61. PubMed ID: 16877389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring low-vision rehabilitation outcomes with the NEI VFQ-25.
    Stelmack JA; Stelmack TR; Massof RW
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Sep; 43(9):2859-68. PubMed ID: 12202503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using the VA LV VFQ-48 and LV VFQ-20 in low vision rehabilitation.
    Stelmack JA; Massof RW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 84(8):705-9. PubMed ID: 17700334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The psychometric validity of the NEI VFQ-25 for use in a low-vision population.
    Marella M; Pesudovs K; Keeffe JE; O'Connor PM; Rees G; Lamoureux EL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 51(6):2878-84. PubMed ID: 20089878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire: an evaluation of its measurement properties using Rasch analysis.
    Lamoureux EL; Pallant JF; Pesudovs K; Hassell JB; Keeffe JE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 47(11):4732-41. PubMed ID: 17065481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Veterans Affairs Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT): design and methodology.
    Stelmack JA; Tang XC; Reda DJ; Moran D; Rinne S; Mancil RM; Cummings R; Mancil G; Stroupe K; Ellis N; Massof RW
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(6):650-60. PubMed ID: 18042574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short- and long-term effects of an intensive inpatient vision rehabilitation program.
    Stelmack JA; Moran D; Dean D; Massof RW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 88(6):691-5. PubMed ID: 17532888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of stochastic measurement models to visual function rating scale questionnaires.
    Massof RW
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 12(2):103-24. PubMed ID: 16019693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Activities of Daily Vision Scale: what do the subscales measure?
    Gothwal VK; Wright TA; Lamoureux EL; Pesudovs K
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Feb; 51(2):694-700. PubMed ID: 19684011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring low vision service outcomes: Rasch analysis of the seven-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire.
    Ryan B; Court H; Margrain TH
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Feb; 85(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 18296928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire or Indian Vision Function Questionnaire for visually impaired: a conundrum.
    Gothwal VK; Reddy SP; Sumalini R; Bharani S; Bagga DK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 53(8):4730-8. PubMed ID: 22700705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maintaining instrument quality while reducing items: application of Rasch analysis to a self-report of visual function.
    Velozo CA; Lai JS; Mallinson T; Hauselman E
    J Outcome Meas; 2000-2001; 4(3):667-80. PubMed ID: 11253902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual Activities Questionnaire: assessment of subscale validity for cataract surgery outcomes.
    Gothwal VK; Wright TA; Lamoureux EL; Pesudovs K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1961-9. PubMed ID: 19878830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceived visual ability for functional vision performance among persons with low vision in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh.
    Nutheti R; Shamanna BR; Krishnaiah S; Gothwal VK; Thomas R; Rao GN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Oct; 45(10):3458-65. PubMed ID: 15452050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of general health status on validity of visual impairment measurement.
    Ahmadian L; Massof R
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2008; 15(5):345-55. PubMed ID: 18850472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study - Visual Function Questionnaire: further improvements in psychometric properties using Rasch analysis.
    Gothwal VK; Bagga DK
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 19(5):306-16. PubMed ID: 22978532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes of the Veterans Affairs Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT).
    Stelmack JA; Tang XC; Reda DJ; Rinne S; Mancil RM; Massof RW;
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2008 May; 126(5):608-17. PubMed ID: 18474769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual Functioning Questionnaire: reevaluation of psychometric properties for a group of working-age adults.
    Langelaan M; van Nispen RM; Knol DL; Moll AC; de Boer MR; Wouters B; van Rens GH
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 84(8):775-84. PubMed ID: 17700340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of the 25-item Cardiff Visual Ability Questionnaire for Children (CVAQC).
    Khadka J; Ryan B; Margrain TH; Court H; Woodhouse JM
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jun; 94(6):730-5. PubMed ID: 20508047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.