293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15505918)
1. Genetics research and the judicial decisions.
Chakrabarty AM
Not Polit; 2002; 18(65):99-102. PubMed ID: 15505918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ordering life: law and the normalization of biotechnology.
Jasanoff S
Not Polit; 2001; 17(62):34-50. PubMed ID: 15468485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Regulating bioethics with judge-made law: the American experience.
Baron CH
Not Polit; 2002; 18(65):32-9. PubMed ID: 15505913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Scientific process, judge-made law and procedural law.
Simon J
Not Polit; 2002; 18(65):44-50. PubMed ID: 15505915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Legal trends in bioethics.
Davis DS
J Clin Ethics; 2000; 11(1):94-5. PubMed ID: 11645768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Who owns my DNA?: the national and international intellectual property law on human embryonic tissue and cloning.
Knowles SM; Adams SD
Cumberland Law Rev; 2001-2002; 32(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 12645552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. European court bans embryonic stem cell patents.
Moran N
Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Dec; 29(12):1057-9. PubMed ID: 22158341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The pedagogical significance of the Bush stem cell policy: a window into bioethical regulation in the United States.
Snead OC
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):491-504. PubMed ID: 15742591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Foreword: what hath (not) Chakrabarty wrought: from the mouse that roared to Hello Dolly and beyond.
Yonover GJ
Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1998; 32(2):349-60. PubMed ID: 12710435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Everybody's got something to hide except me and my patented monkey: patentability of cloned organisms.
Hofmeyer TG
John Marshall J Comput Inf Law; 1998; 16(4):971-95. PubMed ID: 16296558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Bill to ban patents on human organisms nears congressional approval.
Brainard J
Chron High Educ; 2003 Dec; 50(15):A17. PubMed ID: 15287137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Owning our bodies: an examination of property law and biotechnology.
Gold R
San Diego Law Rev; 1995; 32(4):1167-247. PubMed ID: 11656846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Proprietary rights and the norms of science in biotechnology research.
Eisenberg RS
Yale Law J; 1987 Dec; 97(2):177-231. PubMed ID: 11660398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Europe halts decisions on stem-cell patents.
Schubert S
Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7043):720-1. PubMed ID: 15944658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Intellectual property. Groups challenge key stem cell patents.
Kintisch E
Science; 2006 Jul; 313(5785):281. PubMed ID: 16857907
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Moral discourse, bioethics, and the law.
Schneider CE
Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(6):37-9. PubMed ID: 8970801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The paths around stem cell intellectual property.
Taymor KS; Scott CT; Greely HT
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Apr; 24(4):411-3. PubMed ID: 16601720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are living organisms proper subject matter for a patent? United States Supreme Court to decide question of first impression in Parker v. Bergy.
Slade RJ; Van den Broder JM
West State Univ Law Rev; 1979; 7(1):125-131. PubMed ID: 11662797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Historical postmortem. The code as expert witness.
Geraghty K
Virtual Mentor; 2001 May; ():E7. PubMed ID: 15612158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. America as pattern and problem.
Schneider CE
Hastings Cent Rep; 2000; 30(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 10742943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
