These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15505918)

  • 21. Bioethics and health law in New Zealand: bioethics commentary.
    Pickering N
    N Z Bioeth J; 2002 Feb; 3(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 15587483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. US Supreme Court applies strict limits to patents.
    Robertson D
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jul; 20(7):639. PubMed ID: 12089532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A backdoor to policy making: the use of philosophers by the Supreme Court.
    Rao N
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1998; 65(4):1371-401. PubMed ID: 16273694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gene patents, patenting life and the impact of court rulings on US stem cell patents and research.
    Matthews KR; Cuchiara ML
    Regen Med; 2014 Mar; 9(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 24750060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intellectual property. Supreme Court to review the scope of Monsanto's seed patents.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2013 Feb; 339(6120):639. PubMed ID: 23393238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patenting of human genes, cells and parts of the body? -- the ethical dimensions of patent law.
    Moufang R
    IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law; 1994; 25(4):487-515. PubMed ID: 11660161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patents. U.S. Supreme Court delves into what is and isn't patentable.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5933):1374. PubMed ID: 19520926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Washington insider--the President's Council on Bioethics.
    Saunders WL
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 15281181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intellectual property protection for plant innovation: unresolved issues after J.E.M. v. Pioneer.
    Janis MD; Kesan JP
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Nov; 20(11):1161-4. PubMed ID: 12410257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patentability of micro-organisms: Diamond v. Chakrabarty.
    Burns K
    Ark Law Rev; 1982; 35(2):313-27. PubMed ID: 11650697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sherley v. Sebelius.
    Goldfarb N
    Regen Med; 2011 Nov; 6(6 Suppl):104-5. PubMed ID: 21999270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The limiting factor. Biotechnology and the charter for an international science and technology reference court.
    Zweig FM
    Not Polit; 2002; 18(65):51-8. PubMed ID: 15505917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Supreme Court hears argument on patenting life forms.
    Science; 1980 Apr; 208(4439):31-2. PubMed ID: 7361104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intellectual property. What good is a patent? Supreme Court may suggest an answer.
    Kintisch E
    Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5763):946-7. PubMed ID: 16484470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Microorganism patents.
    Behringer JW
    J Pat Off Soc; 1981 Mar; 63(3):128-37. PubMed ID: 11650632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Recent Supreme Court decisions and licensing power.
    Giordano-Coltart J; Calkins CW
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):183-5. PubMed ID: 18259170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The Bioethics law].
    Bréart G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005; 33(1-2):1. PubMed ID: 15752658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Blanket decisions on ethical issues not made.
    Rust M
    Am Med News; 1985 Jan; 28(1):29. PubMed ID: 11653616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Congressional control of federal court jurisdiction: the case study of abortion.
    Greenwood JS
    S C Law Rev; 2003; 54(4):1069-112. PubMed ID: 16493841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Judicial decisionmaking in the age of biotechnology.
    Smith GP
    Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 13(1):93-120. PubMed ID: 15584150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.