These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15506496)

  • 21. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Success and failure factors for hearing-aid prescription: results of a French national survey.
    Abdellaoui A; Tran Ba Huy P
    Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2013 Dec; 130(6):313-9. PubMed ID: 23725663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fitting hearing aids using clinical prefitting speech measures: an evidence-based review.
    Killion MC; Gudmundsen GI
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005; 16(7):439-47. PubMed ID: 16295231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Long-term effects of monaural, binaural and no amplification in subjects with bilateral hearing loss.
    Gelfand SA; Silman S; Ross L
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(4):201-7. PubMed ID: 3438702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Postoperative validation of bone-anchored implants in the single-sided deafness population.
    Snapp H; Angeli S; Telischi FF; Fabry D
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 22314919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. High-frequency audibility: the effects of audiometric configuration, stimulus type, and device.
    Kimlinger C; McCreery R; Lewis D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 25690773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adaptation of the BKB-SIN test for use as a pediatric aided outcome measure.
    Ng SL; Meston CN; Scollie SD; Seewald RC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Jun; 22(6):375-86. PubMed ID: 21864474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory Distraction and Acclimatization to Hearing Aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):174-183. PubMed ID: 27564230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of presentation level on normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' acceptable speech and noise levels.
    Recker KL; Edwards BW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 23231813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Are two ears not better than one?
    McArdle RA; Killion M; Mennite MA; Chisolm TH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Mar; 23(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 22436115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Candidacy for bilateral hearing aids: a retrospective multicenter study.
    Boymans M; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Festen JM; Dreschler WA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 52(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 18664691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [The use of the self-assessment questionnaire to evaluate hearing aid benefit].
    de Almeida K; Taguchi CK
    Pro Fono; 2004; 16(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 15109113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Acceptable noise level as a predictor of hearing aid use.
    Nabelek AK; Freyaldenhoven MC; Tampas JW; Burchfiel SB; Muenchen RA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Oct; 17(9):626-39. PubMed ID: 17039765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Subjective measures of hearing aid benefit and satisfaction in the NIDCD/VA follow-up study.
    Takahashi G; Martinez CD; Beamer S; Bridges J; Noffsinger D; Sugiura K; Bratt GW; Williams DW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Apr; 18(4):323-49. PubMed ID: 17580727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment.
    Gatehouse S; Naylor G; Elberling C
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Jul; 42 Suppl 1():S77-85. PubMed ID: 12918613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions.
    Nabelek AK; Tampas JW; Burchfield SB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Oct; 47(5):1001-11. PubMed ID: 15603458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A computer method for assessing satisfaction with hearing aids.
    Cienkowski KM; McHugh MS; McHugo GJ; Musiek FE; Cox RM; Baird JC
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jul; 45(7):393-9. PubMed ID: 16938797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Factors associated with success with hearing aids in older adults.
    Hickson L; Meyer C; Lovelock K; Lampert M; Khan A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S18-27. PubMed ID: 24447233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.