BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15506691)

  • 21. Absorbed doses with intraoral radiography. Function of various technical parameters.
    Hayakawa Y; Fujimori H; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Oct; 76(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 8233434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dose reduction by field size trimming in rotational panoramic radiography.
    Svanaes DB; Larheim TA; Backe S
    Scand J Dent Res; 1985 Feb; 93(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 3856929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. ESTIMATION OF EFFECTIVE DOSE OF DENTAL X-RAY DEVICES.
    Qiang W; Qiang F; Lin L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jun; 183(4):417-421. PubMed ID: 30169836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Absorbed dose determination for tomographic implant site assessment techniques.
    Kassebaum DK; Stoller NE; McDavid WD; Goshorn B; Ahrens CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Apr; 73(4):502-9. PubMed ID: 1574314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
    Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Radiation absorbed from dental implant radiography: a comparison of linear tomography, CT scan, and panoramic and intra-oral techniques.
    Clark DE; Danforth RA; Barnes RW; Burtch ML
    J Oral Implantol; 1990; 16(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 2098559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Radiobiologic risk estimation from dental radiology. Part I. Absorbed doses to critical organs.
    Underhill TE; Chilvarquer I; Kimura K; Langlais RP; McDavid WD; Preece JW; Barnwell G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Jul; 66(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 3165508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Collimator with filtration compensator: clinical adaptation to meet European Union recommendation 4F on radiological protection for dental radiography.
    Alcaraz M; García-Vera MC; Bravo LA; Martínez-Beneyto Y; Armero D; Morant JJ; Canteras M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):413-20. PubMed ID: 19700536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does the lead apron and collar always reduce radiation dose?
    Nortje CJ; Harris AM; Lackovic KP; Wood RE
    SADJ; 2001 Nov; 56(11):502-4. PubMed ID: 11885424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography.
    Schulze D; Heiland M; Thurmann H; Adam G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 15313998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Determination of absorbed doses of radiation during lateral cephalometric radiography].
    Patsakas AJ; Donta CN; Tsiklakis KD
    Hell Period Stomat Gnathopathoprosopike Cheir; 1989 Jun; 4(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 2640655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Absorbed doses from intraoral radiography with special emphasis on collimator dimensions.
    Stenström B; Henrikson CO; Holm B; Richter S
    Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(1-2):59-71. PubMed ID: 3458320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of the radiation dose in the thyroid gland using different protective collars in panoramic imaging.
    Hafezi L; Arianezhad SM; Hosseini Pooya SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Jul; 47(6):20170428. PubMed ID: 29658781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Radiation absorbed doses in cephalography.
    Eliasson S; Julin P; Richter S; Stenström B
    Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 6585997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
    Granlund C; Thilander-Klang A; Ylhan B; Lofthag-Hansen S; Ekestubbe A
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Technique-dependent decrease in thyroid absorbed dose for dental radiography.
    Wood RE; Bristow RG; Clark GM; Nussbaum C; Taylor KW
    Health Phys; 1989 Jun; 56(6):893-901. PubMed ID: 2722512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dose reduction by direct-digital cephalometric radiography.
    Visser H; Rödig T; Hermann KP
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Jun; 71(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 11407766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
    Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effectiveness of the thyroid shield in dental radiology.
    Sikorski PA; Taylor KW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Aug; 58(2):225-36. PubMed ID: 6592516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Thyroid dose distribution in dental radiography.
    Bristow RG; Wood RE; Clark GM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Oct; 68(4):482-7. PubMed ID: 2797745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.