171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15506860)
1. Dependent effect sizes in meta-analysis: incorporating the degree of interdependence.
Cheung SF; Chan DK
J Appl Psychol; 2004 Oct; 89(5):780-91. PubMed ID: 15506860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A test for publication bias in meta-analysis with sparse binary data.
Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M
Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):721-33. PubMed ID: 16755545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
Huedo-Medina TB; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Botella J
Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16784338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analyzing dependent correlations with correction for artifacts that multiplicatively attenuate the true correlation.
Cheung SF; Chan DK; Sun RW
Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):793-810. PubMed ID: 30136040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A model for integrating fixed-, random-, and mixed-effects meta-analyses into structural equation modeling.
Cheung MW
Psychol Methods; 2008 Sep; 13(3):182-202. PubMed ID: 18778151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Four-fold table cell frequencies imputation in meta analysis.
Di Pietrantonj C
Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(13):2299-322. PubMed ID: 16025540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses: a simulation study of Bayesian and frequentist implementations of three models.
Dohoo I; Stryhn H; Sanchez J
Prev Vet Med; 2007 Sep; 81(1-3):38-55. PubMed ID: 17477995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.
Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Generalized inferences on the overall treatment effect in meta-analysis with normally distributed outcomes.
Tian L
Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 18318039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comment on sampling error in the standardized mean difference with unequal sample sizes: avoiding potential errors in meta-analytic and primary research.
Laczo RM; Sackett PR; Bobko P; Cortina JM
J Appl Psychol; 2005 Jul; 90(4):758-64. PubMed ID: 16060792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of celeration lines on visual data analysis.
Normand MP; Bailey JS
Behav Modif; 2006 May; 30(3):295-314. PubMed ID: 16574816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On tests of the overall treatment effect in meta-analysis with normally distributed responses.
Hartung J; Knapp G
Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(12):1771-82. PubMed ID: 11406840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Size of treatment effects and their importance to clinical research and practice.
Kraemer HC; Kupfer DJ
Biol Psychiatry; 2006 Jun; 59(11):990-6. PubMed ID: 16368078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved Fisher z estimators for univariate random-effects meta-analysis of correlations.
Hafdahl AR
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):233-61. PubMed ID: 18257972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meta-analyzing dependent correlations: an SPSS macro and an R script.
Cheung SF; Chan DK
Behav Res Methods; 2014 Jun; 46(2):331-45. PubMed ID: 24197709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A simulation study comparing properties of heterogeneity measures in meta-analyses.
Mittlböck M; Heinzl H
Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4321-33. PubMed ID: 16991104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis.
Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F
Psychol Methods; 2008 Mar; 13(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 18331152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Applying the law of iterated logarithm to control type I error in cumulative meta-analysis of binary outcomes.
Hu M; Cappelleri JC; Lan KK
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 17848494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Synthesizer 1.0: a varying-coefficient meta-analytic tool.
Krizan Z
Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):863-70. PubMed ID: 20805608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Meta-analytic interval estimation for standardized and unstandardized mean differences.
Bonett DG
Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):225-38. PubMed ID: 19719359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
