These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1550723)

  • 21. Has anyone seen their top-up pay?
    Cassidy J
    Nurs Times; 1996 May 29-Jun 4; 92(22):20-1. PubMed ID: 8716488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Nurses are worth more: protecting the low paid.
    Spanswick A
    Nurs Mirror; 1978 Nov; 147(20):24-5. PubMed ID: 251283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pay campaign. Protest without tears?
    Payne D
    Nurs Times; 1995 May 10-16; 91(19):16. PubMed ID: 7770335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Recruitment and retention: vital evidence in the pay debate.
    Lampada; 1988 Jan; (13):4. PubMed ID: 3357360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Two-tier treatment: why pick on us?
    Day M
    Nurs Times; 1996 Feb 21-27; 92(8):18. PubMed ID: 8710665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The nursing profession must be more assertive over pay.
    Scott H
    Br J Nurs; 2002 Oct 24-Nov 13; 11(19):1228. PubMed ID: 12419974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. National pay is back?
    Gray P
    Nurs Stand; 1997 Feb; 11(20):18. PubMed ID: 9069984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Profile: a new campaigner. Interview by Jean Gray.
    Gray P
    Nurs Stand; 1990 Oct 24-30; 5(5):53. PubMed ID: 2124871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Flexible pay--transparent motives?
    Snell J
    Nurs Times; 1989 Oct 4-10; 85(40):20. PubMed ID: 2587318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pay dispute: morning after the day before.
    Madge T
    Nurs Mirror; 1982 Nov; 155(20):58-9. PubMed ID: 6924327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Big deal.
    Day M
    Nurs Times; 1995 Sep 13-19; 91(37):14-5. PubMed ID: 7567509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Health policy. 15 percent more in wages to English nurses].
    Vestergaard P
    Sygeplejersken; 1988 Jun; 88(22):20-1. PubMed ID: 3394075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Unity now paramount.
    Nurs Times; 1995 Sep 13-19; 91(37):3. PubMed ID: 7567515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Battle lines drawn as unions reject Brown's squeeze on pay.
    Parish C
    Nurs Stand; 2006 Nov 1-7; 21(8):13-4. PubMed ID: 17111948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Management fads? Job evaluation; performance-related pay.
    Mason P
    Nurs Times; 1992 Nov 11-17; 88(46):20-1. PubMed ID: 1454579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Executive pay is rising guess who's footing the bill?
    Beckford-Ball J
    Br J Nurs; 2009 Apr 9-22; 18(7):393. PubMed ID: 19373179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A wasted opportunity.
    Williams K
    Nurs Stand; 1997 Feb; 11(21):14. PubMed ID: 9110771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Presenting the facts.
    Leversidge A
    Midwives; 2013; 16(6):20-1. PubMed ID: 24868733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Union concern over 'undermining' of NHS Pay Review Body's remit.
    Kleebauer A
    Nurs Stand; 2015 Aug; 29(51):9. PubMed ID: 26285960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is a single spine chilling?
    Mason P
    Nurs Times; 1999 Jan 27-Feb 4; 95(4):13. PubMed ID: 10085941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.