These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15507789)

  • 1. Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain.
    Grotle M; Brox JI; Vøllestad NK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(21):E492-501. PubMed ID: 15507789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients.
    Lauridsen HH; Hartvigsen J; Manniche C; Korsholm L; Grunnet-Nilsson N
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2006 Oct; 7():82. PubMed ID: 17064410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Responsiveness of a patient specific outcome measure compared with the Oswestry Disability Index v2.1 and Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire for patients with subacute and chronic low back pain.
    Frost H; Lamb SE; Stewart-Brown S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):2450-7; discussion 2458. PubMed ID: 18824951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in Italian subjects with sub-acute and chronic low back pain.
    Monticone M; Baiardi P; Vanti C; Ferrari S; Pillastrini P; Mugnai R; Foti C
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jan; 21(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 21823035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcome measures in chronic low back pain.
    Maughan EF; Lewis JS
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Sep; 19(9):1484-94. PubMed ID: 20397032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responsiveness of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index in subjects with low back pain.
    Coelho RA; Siqueira FB; Ferreira PH; Ferreira ML
    Eur Spine J; 2008 Aug; 17(8):1101-6. PubMed ID: 18512083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Danish version of the Oswestry disability index for patients with low back pain. Part 2: Sensitivity, specificity and clinically significant improvement in two low back pain populations.
    Lauridsen HH; Hartvigsen J; Manniche C; Korsholm L; Grunnet-Nilsson N
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Nov; 15(11):1717-28. PubMed ID: 16736202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36.
    Walsh TL; Hanscom B; Lurie JD; Weinstein JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 12642770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery.
    DeVine J; Norvell DC; Ecker E; Fourney DR; Vaccaro A; Wang J; Andersson G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S69-74. PubMed ID: 21897347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D in patients with chronic low back pain.
    Soer R; Reneman MF; Speijer BL; Coppes MH; Vroomen PC
    Spine J; 2012 Nov; 12(11):1035-9. PubMed ID: 23199409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 2: sensitivity to change after spinal surgery.
    Mannion AF; Junge A; Grob D; Dvorak J; Fairbank JC
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Jan; 15(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 15856340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison between the low back pain scales for patients with lumbar disc herniation: validity, reliability, and responsiveness.
    Yao M; Xu BP; Li ZJ; Zhu S; Tian ZR; Li DH; Cen J; Cheng SD; Wang YJ; Guo YM; Cui XJ
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Jun; 18(1):175. PubMed ID: 32522196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Responsiveness and interpretability of the Portuguese version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale in patients with chronic low back pain.
    Vieira AC; Moniz S; Fernandes R; Carnide F; Cruz EB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):E346-52. PubMed ID: 24573078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the effectiveness of short-term rehabilitation of women with chronic low back pain using the Oswestry and Roland-Morris Disability Scales.
    Topolska M; Sapuła R; Topolski A; Marczewski K
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2011; 13(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 21857066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of cervical spine surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2015 Jun; 15(6):1203-9. PubMed ID: 24076442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain.
    Chapman JR; Norvell DC; Hermsmeyer JT; Bransford RJ; DeVine J; McGirt MJ; Lee MJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S54-68. PubMed ID: 21952190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How little pain and disability do patients with low back pain have to experience to feel that they have recovered?
    Kamper SJ; Maher CG; Herbert RD; Hancock MJ; Hush JM; Smeets RJ
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Sep; 19(9):1495-501. PubMed ID: 20229120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the functional rating index and the 18-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire: responsiveness and reliability.
    Chansirinukor W; Maher CG; Latimer J; Hush J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan; 30(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 15626994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of lumbar surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Glassman SD; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):2885-91. PubMed ID: 24768731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Construct validity and responsiveness of commonly used patient reported outcome instruments in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Vishwanathan K; Braithwaite I
    J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2021 May; 16():125-131. PubMed ID: 33717946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.