These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
793 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15507798)
1. Segmental motion adjacent to an instrumented lumbar fusion: the effect of extension of fusion to the sacrum. Untch C; Liu Q; Hart R Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(21):2376-81. PubMed ID: 15507798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine. Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spinal instrumentation after complete resection of the last lumbar vertebra: an in vitro biomechanical study after L5 spondylectomy. Bartanusz V; Muzumdar A; Hussain M; Moldavsky M; Bucklen B; Khalil S Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):1017-21. PubMed ID: 21224772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of a novel in vitro cadaveric model for analysis of biomechanics and surgical treatment of Bertolotti syndrome. Golubovsky JL; Colbrunn RW; Klatte RS; Nagle TF; Briskin IN; Chakravarthy VB; Gillespie CM; Reith JD; Jasty N; Benzel EC; Steinmetz MP Spine J; 2020 Apr; 20(4):638-656. PubMed ID: 31669612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis. Akamaru T; Kawahara N; Tim Yoon S; Minamide A; Su Kim K; Tomita K; Hutton WC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1560-6. PubMed ID: 12865845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hybrid dynamic stabilization: a biomechanical assessment of adjacent and supraadjacent levels of the lumbar spine. Mageswaran P; Techy F; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep; 17(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 22839756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis]. Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion. Zhu Q; Itshayek E; Jones CF; Schwab T; Larson CR; Lenke LG; Cripton PA Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S599-611. PubMed ID: 22531900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of iliac screws versus interbody femoral ring allograft on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain. Cunningham BW; Sefter JC; Hu N; Kim SW; Bridwell KH; McAfee PC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):E198-205. PubMed ID: 20195199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment. Mihara H; Onari K; Cheng BC; David SM; Zdeblick TA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 12567023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical effect of 4-rod technique on lumbosacral fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric investigation. Wang T; Liu H; Zheng Z; Li Z; Wang J; Shrivastava SS; Yang H Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jul; 38(15):E925-9. PubMed ID: 23609200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Junction kinematics between proximal mobile and distal fused lumbar segments: biomechanical analysis of pedicle and hook constructs. Hongo M; Gay RE; Zhao KD; Ilharreborde B; Huddleston PM; Berglund LJ; An KN; Zhao C Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):846-53. PubMed ID: 19660990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of lumbosacral fixation using Luque-Galveston and Colorado II sacropelvic fixation: advantage of using locked proximal fixation. Early S; Mahar A; Oka R; Newton P Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jun; 30(12):1396-401. PubMed ID: 15959368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanics of dynamic rod segments for achieving transitional stiffness with lumbosacral fusion. Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Yaqoobi AS; Brasiliense LB; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR Neurosurgery; 2013 Sep; 73(3):517-27. PubMed ID: 23756746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective. Cunningham BW; Hu N; Beatson HJ; Serhan H; Sefter JC; McAfee PC Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 19477694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical effect of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and axial interbody threaded rod on range of motion and S1 screw loading in a destabilized L5-S1 spondylolisthesis model. Fleischer GD; Hart D; Ferrara LA; Freeman AL; Avidano EE Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(2):E82-8. PubMed ID: 24150429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of a new AxiaLIF technique for two-level lumbar fusion. Erkan S; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Hsu B; Pahl DW; Transfeldt EE Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18(6):807-14. PubMed ID: 19352729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine. Cakir B; Carazzo C; Schmidt R; Mattes T; Reichel H; Käfer W Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1287-91. PubMed ID: 19455004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of modified and traditional cortical bone trajectory technique on adjacent segment degeneration in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-finite element analysis. Tuoheti A; Xiao Y; Wang Y; Maimaiti A; Zhang R; Kahaer A; Tuoheti A; Wu X; Rexiti P BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Jan; 25(1):7. PubMed ID: 38166794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]