These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15507904)

  • 1. Stress transfer of four mandibular implant overdenture cantilever designs.
    Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):328-36. PubMed ID: 15507904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
    Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of anchorage systems and extension base contact on load transfer with mandibular implant-retained overdentures.
    Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 11005906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Load Transfer Characteristics of Various Designs of Three-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures.
    Tokar E; Uludag B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1061-7. PubMed ID: 26394342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Load Transfer Characteristics of Three-Implant-Retained Overdentures with Different Interimplant Distances.
    Tokar E; Uludag B; Karacaer O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):363-371. PubMed ID: 28291854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
    Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Photoelastic stress analysis of implant-tooth connected prostheses with segmented and nonsegmented abutments.
    Ochiai KT; Ozawa S; Caputo AA; Nishimura RD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 12806328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of attachment systems on load transfer of an implant-assisted maxillary overdenture.
    Fanuscu MI; Caputo AA
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 15610541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs.
    Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F; Yordshahian F
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21905896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
    Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Photoelastic stress analysis of load transfer to implants and natural teeth comparing rigid and semirigid connectors.
    Nishimura RD; Ochiai KT; Caputo AA; Jeong CM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Jun; 81(6):696-703. PubMed ID: 10347358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of attachment design on strains around implants supporting overdentures.
    Cekiç C; Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Jun; 38(6):e291-7. PubMed ID: 17625616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
    Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Photoelastic analysis of the distribution of stress in different systems of overdentures on osseous-integrated implants.
    Machado AC; Cardoso L; Brandt WC; Henriques GE; de Arruda Nóbilo MA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2332-6. PubMed ID: 22134270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abutment-Bar Structure Connection Geometry: An Important Design Parameter for Implant-Supported Bar-Retained Overdentures With Cantilever Extension.
    Akgün G; Kayacan R
    J Oral Implantol; 2023 Jun; 49(3):330-339. PubMed ID: 36796061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of clip material and cross sections of the bar framework associated with vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-retained overdentures.
    dos Santos MB; Bacchi A; Correr-Sobrinho L; Consani RL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 24392474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of two attachment types on the stresses introduced to the mandibular residual ridge: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Dashti MH; Atashrazm P; Emadi MI; Mishaeel S; Banava S
    Quintessence Int; 2013; 44(8):585-90. PubMed ID: 23757462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA.
    Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Rocha EP
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):766-74. PubMed ID: 18482352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.