These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15507907)
1. Thermo-hydrolytic stability of core foundation and restorative composites. Arksornnukit M; Takahashi H J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):348-53. PubMed ID: 15507907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of shade and storage time on the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness of composites used for indirect restorations. Cesar PF; Miranda WG; Braga RR J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11552166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites. Kim KH; Ong JL; Okuno O J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 12131887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of different types of resin-based composites. Rodrigues Junior SA; Zanchi CH; Carvalho RV; Demarco FF Braz Oral Res; 2007; 21(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 17384850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Post-draw PAN-PMMA nanofiber reinforced and toughened Bis-GMA dental restorative composite. Sun W; Cai Q; Li P; Deng X; Wei Y; Xu M; Yang X Dent Mater; 2010 Sep; 26(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 20579722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of flexural properties of composite restoratives using the ISO and mini-flexural tests. Yap AU; Teoh SH J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Feb; 30(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 12535144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin-based composites: a comparison. Cobb DS; MacGregor KM; Vargas MA; Denehy GE J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Nov; 131(11):1610-5. PubMed ID: 11103581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Polymerization Shrinkage, Physical Properties, and Marginal Adaptation of Flowable and Restorative Bulk Fill Resin-Based Composites. Jung JH; Park SH Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):375-386. PubMed ID: 28402737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flexural strength and moduli of hypoallergenic denture base materials. Pfeiffer P; Rolleke C; Sherif L J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 15798688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rotating fatigue and flexural strength of direct and indirect resin-composite restorative materials. Mirmohammadi H; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ Am J Dent; 2009 Aug; 22(4):219-22. PubMed ID: 19824558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of calcium orthophosphate: Reinforcing glass ratio and prolonged water storage on flexural properties of remineralizing composites. Vilela HS; Campos AL; Cabral C; Chiari MDS; Vieira DN; Braga RR J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Apr; 104():103637. PubMed ID: 32174395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of veneering composite composition on the efficacy of fiber-reinforced restorations (FRR). Ellakwa A; Shortall A; Shehata M; Marquis P Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 11551011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are linear elastic material properties relevant predictors of the cyclic fatigue resistance of dental resin composites? Belli R; Petschelt A; Lohbauer U Dent Mater; 2014 Apr; 30(4):381-91. PubMed ID: 24529534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of aluminum oxide addition on the flexural strength and thermal diffusivity of heat-polymerized acrylic resin. Ellakwa AE; Morsy MA; El-Sheikh AM J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 18482365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conversion degree of indirect resin composites and effect of thermocycling on their physical properties. Souza RO; Ozcan M; Michida SM; de Melo RM; Pavanelli CA; Bottino MA; Soares LE; Martin AA J Prosthodont; 2010 Apr; 19(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 20040031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]