356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15507908)
1. Distortion of disposable plastic stock trays when used with putty vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
Cho GC; Chee WW
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 15507908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disposable plastic trays and their effect on polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impression accuracy-an in vitro study.
Rues S; Stober T; Bargum T; Rammelsberg P; Zenthöfer A
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Mar; 25(3):1475-1484. PubMed ID: 32885321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A clinical pilot study of the dimensional accuracy of double-arch and complete-arch impressions.
Cox JR; Brandt RL; Hughes HJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 May; 87(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12070514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions.
Del'acqua MA; de Avila ÉD; Amaral ÂL; Pinelli LA; de Assis Mollo F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques.
Mishra S; Chowdhary R
J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of a range of addition silicone putty-wash impression materials used in the one-stage technique.
Abuasi HA; Wassell RW
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Mar; 2(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 7920403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation.
Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions made with standard and reinforced stock trays.
Wassell RW; Ibbetson RJ
J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 2072315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions.
Breeding LC; Dixon DL
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 11044846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of the Dies Affected by Tray Type, Material Viscosity, and Pouring Sequence of Dual and Single Arch Impressions- An In vitro Study.
Kulkarni PR; Kulkarni RS; Shah RJ; Chhajlani R; Saklecha B; Maru K
J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Apr; 11(4):ZC128-ZC135. PubMed ID: 28571280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A clinical study comparing the three-dimensional accuracy of a working die generated from two dual-arch trays and a complete-arch custom tray.
Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Phillips KM
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Sep; 90(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 12942055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of different adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane bond strength to two tray materials.
Peregrina A; Land MF; Wandling C; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 16126072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The accuracy of dual-arch impressions: a pilot study.
Larson TD; Nielsen MA; Brackett WW
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):625-7. PubMed ID: 12131884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo Study of the Accuracy of Dual-arch Impressions.
de Lima LM; Borges GA; Junior LH; Spohr AM
J Int Oral Health; 2014 Jun; 6(3):50-5. PubMed ID: 25083032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
