These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15507918)

  • 21. Mandibular Denture Base Deformation with Locator and Ball Attachments of Implant-Retained Overdentures.
    ELsyad MA; Errabti HM; Mustafa AZ
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Dec; 25(8):656-664. PubMed ID: 26376338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vitro study of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: the influence of stud attachments on load transfer to the implant and soft tissue.
    Ichikawa T; Horiuchi M; Wigianto R; Matsumoto N
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 8957878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
    De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Immediate loading of two implants with a mandibular implant-retained overdenture: a new treatment protocol.
    Stoker GT; Wismeijer D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 19681940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Correction of nonparallel implants for an implant-retained overdenture.
    Nunes DB; da Silva P; Pereira-Cenci T; Garbin CA; Schuh C; Boscato N
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(4):e168-71. PubMed ID: 20591765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
    Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Implant-retained partial overdenture with resilient attachments.
    Chikunov I; Doan P; Vahidi F
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):141-148. PubMed ID: 18005337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
    Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Correcting a nonparallel implant abutment for a mandibular overdenture retained by two implants: a clinical report.
    Khadivi V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):216-9. PubMed ID: 15343153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mandibular overdentures retained by two implants: 10-year results from a crossover clinical trial comparing ball-socket and bar-clip attachments.
    Cune M; Burgers M; van Kampen F; de Putter C; van der Bilt A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 20617218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
    Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of implant-supported, bar- or ball-retained mandibular overdentures: a retrospective clinical, microbiologic, and immunologic study of 10 edentulous patients attending a recall visit.
    Lachmann S; Kimmerle-Müller E; Gehring K; Axmann D; Gomez-Roman G; Watzek G; Weber H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 17319360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A simple, predictable intraoral technique for retentive mechanism attachment of implant overdenture attachments.
    Daher T
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):202-5. PubMed ID: 14508743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: 3-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol.
    Walton JN
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12854788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stress analysis of mandibular two-implant overdenture with different attachment systems.
    Takeshita S; Kanazawa M; Minakuchi S
    Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(6):928-34. PubMed ID: 22123019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs.
    Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F; Yordshahian F
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21905896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.