148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15508048)
1. [The risks associated with the wish for a caesarean section].
Feige A
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2004 Oct; 208(5):163-4. PubMed ID: 15508048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproductive autonomy and normalization of cesarean section.
Tsu PS
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(7):61-2. PubMed ID: 22694042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Is non-directive counseling for patient choice cesarean delivery ethically justified?
Kalish RB; McCullough LB; Chervenak FA
J Perinat Med; 2007; 35(6):478-80. PubMed ID: 18052833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risks of patient choice cesarean.
Belizán JM; Cafferata ML; Althabe F; Buekens P
Birth; 2006 Jun; 33(2):167-9. PubMed ID: 16732786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The importance of risk tolerance in maternal autonomy.
Kapfhamer JD; Menon S; Spellecy R
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(7):53-4. PubMed ID: 22694037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Increasing cesarean rates: the balance of technology, autonomy, and beneficence.
Shah KR
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(7):58-9. PubMed ID: 22694040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Where are the midwives?
Rothman BK
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(7):56-8. PubMed ID: 22694039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Maternal request caesarean section: maternal vs medical autonomy.
Esen UI; Archibong EI
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2007 Nov; 68(11):610-1. PubMed ID: 18087854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Relational autonomy on the cutting edge.
Berkhout S
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(7):59-61. PubMed ID: 22694041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond numbers: the multiple cultural meanings of rising cesarean rates worldwide.
Orfali K
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(7):54-6. PubMed ID: 22694038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The professional responsibility model of respect for autonomy in decision making about cesarean delivery.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 22694022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. "Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request": was the NIH conference based on a faulty premise?
Young D
Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 16948716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The ethics of cesarean section by choice.
Minkoff H
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):309-12. PubMed ID: 17011404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethics of caesarean section in the USA.
Midwifery; 2004 Mar; 20(1):118. PubMed ID: 15129667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Patients' satisfaction with and attitudes toward vaginal delivery.
McLennan MT; Alten B; Melick C; Hoehn M; Young J
J Reprod Med; 2005 Oct; 50(10):740-4. PubMed ID: 16320554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Women's autonomy and scheduled cesarean sections in Brazil: a cautionary tale.
Potter JE; Hopkins K; Faúndes A; Perpétuo I
Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 18307486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cesarean delivery by patient choice: where do things stand?
Herbert WN
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2007 Mar; 62(3):153-4. PubMed ID: 17306040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. AGAINST: Caesarean delivery on maternal request is a bad idea.
Silver RM
BJOG; 2015 Feb; 122(3):360. PubMed ID: 25623573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Does discussion of possible scar rupture influence preferred mode of delivery after a caesarean section?
Sur S; Mackenzie IZ
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 May; 25(4):338-41. PubMed ID: 16091312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The other side of the bed.
Devinney CA
J Fam Pract; 1997 Jun; 44(6):521-2. PubMed ID: 9191611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
