These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15508148)

  • 1. Estimating the arterial input function using two reference tissues in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies: fundamental concepts and simulations.
    Yang C; Karczmar GS; Medved M; Stadler WM
    Magn Reson Med; 2004 Nov; 52(5):1110-7. PubMed ID: 15508148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple reference tissue method for contrast agent arterial input function estimation.
    Yang C; Karczmar GS; Medved M; Stadler WM
    Magn Reson Med; 2007 Dec; 58(6):1266-75. PubMed ID: 17969061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
    Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subcompartmentalization of extracellular extravascular space (EES) into permeability and leaky space with local arterial input function (AIF) results in improved discrimination between high- and low-grade glioma using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.
    Sahoo P; Rathore RK; Awasthi R; Roy B; Verma S; Rathore D; Behari S; Husain M; Husain N; Pandey CM; Mohakud S; Gupta RK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 38(3):677-88. PubMed ID: 23390002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of model-based arterial input functions for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in tumor bearing rats.
    McGrath DM; Bradley DP; Tessier JL; Lacey T; Taylor CJ; Parker GJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2009 May; 61(5):1173-84. PubMed ID: 19253360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results.
    Schabel MC; DiBella EV; Jensen RL; Salzman KL
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4807-23. PubMed ID: 20679695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the knee in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis using an arterial input function (AIF) extracted from popliteal artery enhancement, and the effect of the choice of the AIF on the kinetic parameters.
    Workie DW; Dardzinski BJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2005 Sep; 54(3):560-8. PubMed ID: 16088875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of contrast agent concentration in intra- and extra-vascular spaces of brain tissue.
    Yahaghi E; Soltanian-Zadeh H; Shahriari M; Fatouraee N; Ewing JR
    Math Biosci; 2006 Nov; 204(1):102-18. PubMed ID: 16978665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer using independent component analysis.
    Mehrabian H; Da Rosa M; Haider MA; Martel AL
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1236-1245. PubMed ID: 26297961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blind estimation of the arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using purity maximization.
    Lin YC; Chan TH; Chi CY; Ng SH; Liu HL; Wei KC; Wai YY; Wang CC; Wang JJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2012 Nov; 68(5):1439-49. PubMed ID: 22383386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of the effect of haematocrit-dependent arterial input functions on the accuracy of pharmacokinetic parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Just N; Koh DM; D'Arcy J; Collins DJ; Leach MO
    NMR Biomed; 2011 Aug; 24(7):902-15. PubMed ID: 21290457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: I. Simulations.
    Schabel MC; Fluckiger JU; DiBella EV
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4783-806. PubMed ID: 20679691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraindividual in vivo comparison of gadolinium contrast agents for pharmacokinetic analysis using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Liang J; Sammet S; Yang X; Jia G; Takayama Y; Knopp MV
    Invest Radiol; 2010 May; 45(5):233-44. PubMed ID: 20351653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correcting saturation effects of the arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI: a Monte Carlo simulation.
    Brunecker P; Villringer A; Schultze J; Nolte CH; Jungehülsing GJ; Endres M; Steinbrink J
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 25(9):1300-11. PubMed ID: 17462846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of errors associated with single- and multi-bolus injection protocols in low-temporal-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced tracer kinetic analysis.
    Roberts C; Buckley DL; Parker GJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2006 Sep; 56(3):611-9. PubMed ID: 16858671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer.
    Li X; Welch EB; Arlinghaus LR; Chakravarthy AB; Xu L; Farley J; Loveless ME; Mayer IA; Kelley MC; Meszoely IM; Means-Powell JA; Abramson VG; Grau AM; Gore JC; Yankeelov TE
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(17):5753-69. PubMed ID: 21841212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of T2* correction on contrast kinetic model analysis using a reference tissue arterial input function at 7 T.
    Zhang J; Freed M; Winters K; Kim SG
    MAGMA; 2015 Dec; 28(6):555-63. PubMed ID: 26239630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved bolus arrival time and arterial input function estimation for tracer kinetic analysis in DCE-MRI.
    Singh A; Rathore RK; Haris M; Verma SK; Husain N; Gupta RK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 29(1):166-76. PubMed ID: 19097111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Model-based blind estimation of kinetic parameters in dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI.
    Fluckiger JU; Schabel MC; Dibella EV
    Magn Reson Med; 2009 Dec; 62(6):1477-86. PubMed ID: 19859949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Algorithms for calculation of kinetic parameters from T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Horsfield MA; Morgan B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Oct; 20(4):723-9. PubMed ID: 15390235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.