124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15508230)
1. Is moral theory perplexed by new genetic technology?
Arneson RJ
San Diego Law Rev; 2002; 39(3):715-36. PubMed ID: 15508230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Tying Prometheus down: the international law of human genetic manipulation.
Marks SP
Chic J Int Law; 2002; 3(1):115-36. PubMed ID: 15709303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Designer genes: an ethical perspective on genetic manipulation.
Dreeman CJ
Rutgers Comput Technol Law J; 1989; 15(2):447-74. PubMed ID: 16100798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic manipulation in humans as a matter of Rawlsian justice.
Brown JS
Soc Theory Pract; 2001 Jan; 27(1):83-110. PubMed ID: 12564445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomedical enhancements as justice.
Nam J
Bioethics; 2015 Feb; 29(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 24117708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic interventions: (yet) another challenge to allocating health care.
Rai AK
San Diego Law Rev; 2002; 39(3):657-67. PubMed ID: 15508226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetics and the common good.
Tauer CA
Second Opin (Chic); 2001 Oct; (8):14-35. PubMed ID: 16025643
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What can bioethics contribute to ethical theory?
Brock DW
APA Newsl Philos Med; 2002; 2(1):179-83. PubMed ID: 15040327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. New technology ethic.
Macer D
Taiwan Yi Xue Ren Wen Xue Kan; 2001 Oct; 2(1-2):41-7. PubMed ID: 15011655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The genetic conception of health: is it as radical as claimed?
Petersen A
Health (London); 2006 Oct; 10(4):481-500. PubMed ID: 16973682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The writing is on the wall.
Wolbring G
Genewatch; 2000 Jul; 13(3):8-9. PubMed ID: 12814103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Food and agricultural biotechnology: a summary and analysis of ethical concerns.
Thompson PB; Hannah W
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2008; 111():229-64. PubMed ID: 18496654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Our posthuman future: Discussing the consequences of biotechnological advances.
Silvers A
Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(6):4-5; author reply 6-7. PubMed ID: 16396192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Moral suasion, installed.
Sprinkle RH
Politics Life Sci; 2010 Mar; 29(1):88-9. PubMed ID: 20812805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The case against perfection: what's wrong with designer children, bionic athletes, and genetic engineering.
Sandel MJ
Atl Mon; 2004 Apr; 292(3):50-4, 56-60, 62. PubMed ID: 15468473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Justifying a presumption of restraint in animal biotechnology research.
Fiester A
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jun; 8(6):36-44. PubMed ID: 18726779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How not to end disability.
Richards JR
San Diego Law Rev; 2002; 39(3):693-713. PubMed ID: 15508229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Intellectual property, genetically modified crops and bioethics.
Adcock M
Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1088-92. PubMed ID: 17703487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The ethics of genetic intervention: human research and blurred species boundaries.
Dresser R
San Diego Law Rev; 2002; 39(3):737-46. PubMed ID: 15508231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Why conservatives care about biotechnology.
Wolfson A
New Atlantis; 2003; (2):55-64. PubMed ID: 15584197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
