These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15508864)

  • 21. Reliability and validity of the Melbourne Edge Test and High/Low Contrast Visual Acuity chart.
    Haymes SA; Chen J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 May; 81(5):308-16. PubMed ID: 15181355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. REPRODUCIBILITY AND COMPARISON OF VISUAL ACUITY OBTAINED WITH SIGHTBOOK MOBILE APPLICATION TO NEAR CARD AND SNELLEN CHART.
    Phung L; Gregori NZ; Ortiz A; Shi W; Schiffman JC
    Retina; 2016 May; 36(5):1009-20. PubMed ID: 26509223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Objective vs subjective measurements of dark vergence.
    Jaschinski W; Jainta S; Hoormann J; Walper N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jan; 27(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 17239194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accommodative response under monocular and binocular conditions as a function of phoria in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.
    Momeni-Moghaddam H; Goss DA; Sobhani M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Jan; 97(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 23808381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Repeatability of the modified Thorington card used to measure far heterophoria.
    Cebrian JL; Antona B; Barrio A; Gonzalez E; Gutierrez A; Sanchez I
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Jul; 91(7):786-92. PubMed ID: 24901486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reliability of a standardized reading chart system: variance component analysis, test-retest and inter-chart reliability.
    Stifter E; König F; Lang T; Bauer P; Richter-Müksch S; Velikay-Parel M; Radner W
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2004 Jan; 242(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 14666372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of near heterophoria tests under varying conditions on an adult sample.
    Lam AK; Lam A; Charm J; Wong KM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Mar; 25(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 15713208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Validity and Repeatability of a Novel Dynamic Visual Acuity System.
    Hirano M; Hutchings N; Simpson T; Dalton K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 May; 94(5):616-625. PubMed ID: 28422802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliability of the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol in children 7 to <13 years old.
    Cotter SA; Chu RH; Chandler DL; Beck RW; Holmes JM; Rice ML; Hertle RW; Birch EE; Moke PS
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 136(4):655-61. PubMed ID: 14516805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accommodative and vergence difficulties interfering with image clarity through a binocular indirect ophthalmoscope.
    Winters JE; Frantz KA; Kern RM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Apr; 81(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 15097768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Binocular vision anomalies and normative data (BAND) in Tamil Nadu: report 1.
    Hussaindeen JR; Rakshit A; Singh NK; Swaminathan M; George R; Kapur S; Scheiman M; Ramani KK
    Clin Exp Optom; 2017 May; 100(3):278-284. PubMed ID: 27796049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of fixation disparity on distance binocular visual acuity.
    Jenkins TC; Abd-Manan F; Pardhan S; Murgatroyd RN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1994 Apr; 14(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 8022594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of fixation disparity measurements obtained with the Wesson Fixation Disparity Card and the Sheedy Disparometer.
    Dittemore D; Crum J; Kirschen D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 May; 70(5):414-20. PubMed ID: 8515972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. BVAT distance vs. near stereopsis screening of strabismus, strabismic amblyopia and refractive amblyopia; a prospective study of 68 patients.
    Rutstein RP; Corliss DA
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2000; 15(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 10960226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fixation disparity, accommodation, dark vergence and dark focus during inclined gaze.
    Jaschinski W; Koitcheva V; Heuer H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 Jul; 18(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 9829107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reliability of visual acuity in children with reduced vision.
    Kheterpal S; Jones HS; Auld R; Moseley MJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Sep; 16(5):447-9. PubMed ID: 8944189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability and validity of an automated computerized visual acuity and stereoacuity test in children using an interactive video game.
    Ma DJ; Yang HK; Hwang JM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Jul; 156(1):195-201.e1. PubMed ID: 23582763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The Teller Acuity Card Test: possibilities and limits of clinical use].
    Katz B; Sireteanu R
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1989 Jul; 195(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 2796227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reliability of the CSV-1000 in adults and children.
    Kelly SA; Pang Y; Klemencic S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 89(8):1172-81. PubMed ID: 22797510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fixation disparity and near visual acuity.
    Jenkins TC; Abd-Manan F; Pardhan S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Jan; 15(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 7724221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.