116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15509686)
1. Cost efficiency analysis of modern cytocentrifugation methods versus liquid based (Cytyc Thinprep) processing of urinary samples.
Piaton E; Hutin K; Faÿnel J; Ranchin MC; Cottier M
J Clin Pathol; 2004 Nov; 57(11):1208-12. PubMed ID: 15509686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conventional liquid-based techniques versus Cytyc Thinprep processing of urinary samples: a qualitative approach.
Piaton E; Faÿnel J; Hutin K; Ranchin MC; Cottier M
BMC Clin Pathol; 2005 Oct; 5():9. PubMed ID: 16207384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of ThinPrep and SurePath liquid-based cytology and subsequent human papillomavirus DNA testing in China.
Zhao FH; Hu SY; Bian JJ; Liu B; Peck RB; Bao YP; Pan QJ; Frappart L; Sellors J; Qiao YL
Cancer Cytopathol; 2011 Dec; 119(6):387-94. PubMed ID: 21774094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effectiveness of the liquid-based preparation method in cerebrospinal fluid cytology.
Argon A; Uyaroğlu MA; Nart D; Veral A; Kitapçıoğlu G
Acta Cytol; 2013; 57(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 23636078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The usefulness of the filtration-adhesion method in urine cytology].
Torres Gómez FJ; Torres Gómez A; Torres Olivera FJ
Arch Esp Urol; 2008 Apr; 61(3):371-5. PubMed ID: 18581674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Value of CK20 immunocytochemistry as an adjuvant to urine liquid-based cytology in detection of urothelial carcinoma].
Li M; Li HX; Guo HQ; Zhao H; Zhao LL; Ma JH; Li CL; Cao J; Pan QJ
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 34(9):669-73. PubMed ID: 23159079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Romanowsky staining using liquid-based cytology: A pilot study using Cytolyt(®)/HESPANDER(®) processing solution for ThinPrep(®) preparations.
Kinoshita Y; Yuri T; Yoshizawa K; Takasu K; Emoto Y; Tsubura A; Shikata N
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Dec; 43(12):960-5. PubMed ID: 26390201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between cytospin and liquid-based cytology in urine specimens classified according to the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.
Straccia P; Bizzarro T; Fadda G; Pierconti F
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Jul; 124(7):519-23. PubMed ID: 26989867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cellular fixation. A study of CytoRich Red and Cytospin Collection Fluid.
Weidmann J; Chaubal A; Bibbo M
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):182-7. PubMed ID: 9022742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of CytoLyt® hemolytic action on ThinPrep® LBC using cultured osteosarcoma cell line LM8.
Norimatsu Y; Ohsaki H; Masuno H; Kagawa A; Teramoto N; Kobayashi TK
Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 24157542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a centrifuge method and thin-layer preparation in urine cytology.
Zardawi IM; Duncan J
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(6):1038-42. PubMed ID: 14674075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recovery of human papillomavirus nucleic acids from liquid-based cytology media.
Powell N; Smith K; Fiander A
J Virol Methods; 2006 Oct; 137(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 16828171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Liquid-based cytology in the fine needle aspiration of parathyroid lesions: a comparison study with the conventional smear, ThinPrep, and SurePath.
Park GS; Lee SH; Jung SL; Jung CK
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2015; 8(10):12160-8. PubMed ID: 26722400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The diagnostic value of cell block as an adjunct to liquid-based cytology of bronchial washing specimens in the diagnosis and subclassification of pulmonary neoplasms.
Collins GR; Thomas J; Joshi N; Zhang S
Cancer Cytopathol; 2012 Apr; 120(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 21751430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-minimization analysis of jumbo reusable forceps versus disposable forceps in a high-volume ambulatory endoscopy center.
Hogan RB; Santa-Cruz R; Weeks ES; Alexander L; Hogan RB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Feb; 69(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18725156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of cytocentrifugation and sedimentation techniques for CSF cytomorphology.
Dyken PR; Shirley S; Trefz J; El Gammal T
Acta Cytol; 1980; 24(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 6989142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low-grade urothelial carcinoma: reappraisal of the cytologic criteria on ThinPrep.
Xin W; Raab SS; Michael CW
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Sep; 29(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 12951678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparison Between ThinPrep Monolayer and Cytospin Cytology for the Detection of Bladder Cancer.
Kim JY; Kim HJ
Korean J Urol; 2014 Jun; 55(6):390-4. PubMed ID: 24955223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proteomic analysis of high-grade dysplastic cervical cells obtained from ThinPrep slides using laser capture microdissection and mass spectrometry.
Gu Y; Wu SL; Meyer JL; Hancock WS; Burg LJ; Linder J; Hanlon DW; Karger BL
J Proteome Res; 2007 Nov; 6(11):4256-68. PubMed ID: 17902640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evaluation of ThinPrep UroCyte filters for the preparation of slides for fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Kipp BR; Campion MB; Coffman E; Smith A; Tomisek JD; Browne GG; Panella JR; Desai R; Harwood AR; Halling KC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Jul; 34(7):479-84. PubMed ID: 16783776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
