116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15509686)
21. Has the ThinPrep method of cervical screening maintained its improvement over conventional smears in terms of specimen adequacy?
Treacy A; Reynolds J; Kay EW; Leader M; Grace A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Apr; 37(4):239-40. PubMed ID: 19217033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cytocentrifuge preparation in veterinary cytology: a quick, simple, and affordable manual method to concentrate low cellularity fluids.
Marcos R; Santos M; Marrinhas C; Correia-Gomes C; Caniatti M
Vet Clin Pathol; 2016 Dec; 45(4):725-731. PubMed ID: 27859449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [The cytocentrifuge in cerebrospinal fluid cytodiagnosis].
Schedifka R; Wagner G
Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1978 Oct; 30(10):620-3. PubMed ID: 733987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison between cytospin and liquid-based cytology in cerebrospinal fluid diagnosis of neoplastic diseases: A single institution experience.
Straccia P; Fadda G; Pierconti F
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):236-240. PubMed ID: 30468697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [A simple method for doubling the cytocentrifugation capacity of the Shandon Cytospin 2].
Rabouille Y; Elie H; Lecluse M
Ann Pathol; 1990; 10(5-6):358-9. PubMed ID: 2085362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Liquid-based cytology can improve efficiency of cervical smear readers: evidence from timing surveys in two NHS cytology laboratories.
Dowie R; Stoykova B; Crawford D; Desai M; Mather J; Morgan K; Shirt M
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 16548990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic classification of urothelial cells in urine cytology specimens using exclusively spectral information.
Jaganath R; Angeletti C; Levenson R; Rimm DL
Cancer; 2004 Jun; 102(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 15211478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cytyc Corporation ThinPrep processor.
Kisner HJ
Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1994; 8(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 10133986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Changes in specimen preparation method may impact urine cytologic evaluation.
Voss JS; Kipp BR; Krueger AK; Clayton AC; Halling KC; Karnes RJ; Henry MR; Sebo TJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Sep; 130(3):428-33. PubMed ID: 18701417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Cyto-Shuttle and cytocentrifuge as processing methods for nongynecologic cytology specimens.
Robb J; Melello C; Odom C
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 8725129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. High-grade urothelial carcinoma: comparison of SurePath liquid-based processing with cytospin processing.
Lu DY; Nassar A; Siddiqui MT
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Jan; 37(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 18973118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Application of the ThinPrep imaging system in urine cytology: a prospective study.
van Hemel BM; Haarsma JG; Ruitenbeek T; Groen HJ; Suurmeijer AJ
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Aug; 121(8):410-4. PubMed ID: 23907818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Liquid-based cervical cytology.
Klinkhamer PJ; Meerding WJ; Rosier PF; Hanselaar AG
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):263-71. PubMed ID: 14579292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Collection fluid helps preservation in voided urine cytology.
Raistrick J; Shambayati B; Dunsmuir W
Cytopathology; 2008 Apr; 19(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 18352862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of cellular recovery rates and morphologic detail obtained using membrane filter and cytocentrifuge techniques.
Barrett DL; King EB
Acta Cytol; 1976; 20(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 1065177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Image analysis of peripheral compression artefacts of ThinPrep(®) liquid-based cytology preparations.
Choi J; Shim HS; Song JW; Chae SW; Lee YN; Kim JE; Kim SH
Cytopathology; 2013 Apr; 24(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 22612864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An alternative cost effectiveness analysis of ThinPrep in the Australian setting.
Neville AM; Quinn MA
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug; 45(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 16029294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cervical specimens collected in liquid buffer are suitable for both cytologic screening and ancillary human papillomavirus testing.
Sherman ME; Schiffman MH; Lorincz AT; Herrero R; Hutchinson ML; Bratti C; Zahniser D; Morales J; Hildesheim A; Helgesen K; Kelly D; Alfaro M; Mena F; Balmaceda I; Mango L; Greenberg M
Cancer; 1997 Apr; 81(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 9126136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology in cervical cancer screening.
Akamatsu S; Kodama S; Himeji Y; Ikuta N; Shimagaki N
Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 22846595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital].
Lejeune C; Prost P; Michiels C; Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP; Phelip JM; Martin L; Rassiat E; Faivre J
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
