BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15509724)

  • 1. A genetic algorithm approach to detecting lineage-specific variation in selection pressure.
    Pond SL; Frost SD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Mar; 22(3):478-85. PubMed ID: 15509724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The roles of positive and negative selection in the molecular evolution of insect endosymbionts.
    Fry AJ; Wernegreen JJ
    Gene; 2005 Aug; 355():1-10. PubMed ID: 16039807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating absolute rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution in order to characterize natural selection and date species divergences.
    Seo TK; Kishino H; Thorne JL
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jul; 21(7):1201-13. PubMed ID: 15014159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating the distribution of selection coefficients from phylogenetic data with applications to mitochondrial and viral DNA.
    Nielsen R; Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2003 Aug; 20(8):1231-9. PubMed ID: 12777508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Site-to-site variation of synonymous substitution rates.
    Pond SK; Muse SV
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2375-85. PubMed ID: 16107593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heterogeneous selection on LEGCYC paralogs in relation to flower morphology and the phylogeny of Lupinus (Leguminosae).
    Ree RH; Citerne HL; Lavin M; Cronk QC
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Feb; 21(2):321-31. PubMed ID: 14660696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inferring speciation times under an episodic molecular clock.
    Rannala B; Yang Z
    Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 17558967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evolutionary model selection with a genetic algorithm: a case study using stem RNA.
    Kosakovsky Pond SL; Mannino FV; Gravenor MB; Muse SV; Frost SD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Jan; 24(1):159-70. PubMed ID: 17038448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective pressures at a codon-level predict deleterious mutations in human disease genes.
    Arbiza L; Duchi S; Montaner D; Burguet J; Pantoja-Uceda D; Pineda-Lucena A; Dopazo J; Dopazo H
    J Mol Biol; 2006 May; 358(5):1390-404. PubMed ID: 16584746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Codon-substitution models for detecting molecular adaptation at individual sites along specific lineages.
    Yang Z; Nielsen R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):908-17. PubMed ID: 12032247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of branch length variation on the selection of models of molecular evolution.
    Posada D
    J Mol Evol; 2001 May; 52(5):434-44. PubMed ID: 11443347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Likelihood-based clustering (LiBaC) for codon models, a method for grouping sites according to similarities in the underlying process of evolution.
    Bao L; Gu H; Dunn KA; Bielawski JP
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Sep; 25(9):1995-2007. PubMed ID: 18586695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The positive correlation between dN/dS and dS in mammals is due to runs of adjacent substitutions.
    Stoletzki N; Eyre-Walker A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Apr; 28(4):1371-80. PubMed ID: 21115654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Likelihood ratio tests for detecting positive selection and application to primate lysozyme evolution.
    Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 1998 May; 15(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 9580986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Towards realistic codon models: among site variability and dependency of synonymous and non-synonymous rates.
    Mayrose I; Doron-Faigenboim A; Bacharach E; Pupko T
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i319-27. PubMed ID: 17646313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic robustness at the codon level as a measure of selection.
    Archetti M
    Gene; 2009 Aug; 443(1-2):64-9. PubMed ID: 19477246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Bayesian model comparison approach to inferring positive selection.
    Scheffler K; Seoighe C
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2531-40. PubMed ID: 16120799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variation in positive selection in termite GNBPs and Relish.
    Bulmer MS; Crozier RH
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Feb; 23(2):317-26. PubMed ID: 16221893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple hypothesis testing to detect lineages under positive selection that affects only a few sites.
    Anisimova M; Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 May; 24(5):1219-28. PubMed ID: 17339634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lineage-specific differences in evolutionary mode in a salamander courtship pheromone.
    Palmer CA; Watts RA; Gregg RG; McCall MA; Houck LD; Highton R; Arnold SJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Nov; 22(11):2243-56. PubMed ID: 16033988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.