304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15509937)
1. Comparison of canine mandibular bone regeneration by distraction osteogenesis versus acute resection and rigid external fixation.
Gosain AK; Kalantarian B; Song LS; Larson JD; Jenkins CA; Wilson CR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Nov; 114(6):1490-9; discussion 1500-1. PubMed ID: 15509937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gene expression of TGF-beta, TGF-beta receptor, and extracellular matrix proteins during membranous bone healing in rats.
Steinbrech DS; Mehrara BJ; Rowe NM; Dudziak ME; Luchs JS; Saadeh PB; Gittes GK; Longaker MT
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 May; 105(6):2028-38. PubMed ID: 10839400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Beneficial role of periosteum in distraction osteogenesis of mandible: its preservation prevents the external bone resorption.
Takeuchi S; Matsuo A; Chiba H
Tohoku J Exp Med; 2010 Jan; 220(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 20046054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bony healing of large cranial and mandibular defects protected from soft-tissue interposition: A comparative study of spontaneous bone regeneration, osteoconduction, and cancellous autografting in dogs.
Lemperle SM; Calhoun CJ; Curran RW; Holmes RE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Mar; 101(3):660-72. PubMed ID: 9500382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental mandibular regrowth by distraction osteogenesis. Long-term results.
Costantino PD; Friedman CD; Shindo ML; Houston G; Sisson GA
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1993 May; 119(5):511-6. PubMed ID: 8484939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distraction osteogenesis of free interpositional membranous bone: experimental design.
Cho BC; Lee JH; Baik BS; Liou EJ; Figueroa AA; Cohen M
J Craniofac Surg; 1999 Mar; 10(2):123-7; discussion 128. PubMed ID: 10388412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of bone morphogenetic proteins BMP-2 and BMP-4 and their related postreceptor signaling system (Smads) in distraction osteogenesis of the mandible.
Farhadieh RD; Gianoutsos MP; Yu Y; Walsh WR
J Craniofac Surg; 2004 Sep; 15(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 15346005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Primary study of the use of a shape-memory alloy distraction device in the dog mandible for alveolar ridge distraction: determination of osteotomy techniques and evaluation of osteogenesis outcome.
Xie M; Xiao H; Hu M; Liu H; Li Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 70(12):2876-83. PubMed ID: 22632929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible: histomorphometric evaluation of bone.
Glowacki J; Shusterman EM; Troulis M; Holmes R; Perrott D; Kaban LB
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Feb; 113(2):566-73. PubMed ID: 14758219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-beta1) on the regenerate bone in distraction osteogenesis.
Ozkan K; Eralp L; Kocaoglu M; Ahishali B; Bilgic B; Mutlu Z; Turker M; Ozkan FU; Sahin K; Guven M
Growth Factors; 2007 Apr; 25(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 17891595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of latency on the quality and quantity of bone produced by dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis.
Moore C; Campbell PM; Dechow PC; Ellis ML; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):470-8. PubMed ID: 21967933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reverse Dynamization Accelerates Regenerate Bone Formation and Remodeling in a Goat Distraction Osteogenesis Model.
Bafor A; Iobst C; Samchukov M; Cherkashin A; Singh S; Aguilar L; Glatt V
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2023 Dec; 105(24):1937-1946. PubMed ID: 37639500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of guided bone regeneration principle in preventing fibrous healing in distraction osteogenesis at high speed: experimental study in rabbit mandibles.
Elshahat A; Inoue N; Marti G; Safe I; Manson P; Vanderkolk C
J Craniofac Surg; 2004 Nov; 15(6):916-21. PubMed ID: 15547374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The bone regenerative effect of chitosan microsphere-encapsulated growth hormone on bony consolidation in mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a dog model.
Cho BC; Kim JY; Lee JH; Chung HY; Park JW; Roh KH; Kim GU; Kwon IC; Jang KH; Lee DS; Park NW; Kim IS
J Craniofac Surg; 2004 Mar; 15(2):299-311; discussion 312-3. PubMed ID: 15167253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the effects of guided bone regeneration and periosteum on newly formed bone in a distraction gap.
Kilic E; Alkan A; Demetoglu U; Ozturk M
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1871-4. PubMed ID: 21959452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regeneration of Craniofacial Bone Induced by Periosteal Pumping.
Saulacic N; García-González M; Muñoz Guzon FM; Garcia Garcia A; Sadath-Marashi Z; Rohrer U; Ferrari SL
Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2022 Feb; 28(2):61-72. PubMed ID: 35107342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The bone regenerative effect of growth hormone on consolidation in mandibular distraction osteogenesis of a dog model.
Cho BC; Moon JH; Chung HY; Park JW; Kweon IC; Kim IS
J Craniofac Surg; 2003 May; 14(3):417-25. PubMed ID: 12826814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. An experimental study on sheep.
Karaharju-Suvanto T; Peltonen J; Kahri A; Karaharju EO
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Apr; 21(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 1602159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of BMP, betaig-h3, and chitosan in early bony consolidation in distraction osteogenesis in a dog model.
Kim IS; Park JW; Kwon IC; Baik BS; Cho BC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 May; 109(6):1966-77. PubMed ID: 11994601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bilateral mandibular distraction in adult dogs with an epiperiosteal distractor.
Hasse AR; Pörksen M; Zimmermann CE
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Apr; 43(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 15749209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
