198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15511023)
1. The bell should toll for the linear no-threshold model.
Higson DJ
J Radiol Prot; 2004 Sep; 24(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 15511023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The bell tolls for LNT.
Higson DJ
Health Phys; 2004 Nov; 87(5 Suppl):S47-50. PubMed ID: 15551779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comments about Potter's review of internal dosimetry.
Lloyd RD; Miller SC; Taylor GN; Bruenger FW; Jee WS
Health Phys; 2005 May; 88(5):497-8; author reply 498. PubMed ID: 15824599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Linear-no-threshold is a radiation-protection standard rather than a mechanistic effect model.
Breckow J
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 16468065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Half a century of internal dosimetry.
Stather JW
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 14653330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Internal dosimetry--a review.
Potter CA
Health Phys; 2004 Nov; 87(5):455-68. PubMed ID: 15551784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Internal dosimetry: a review.
Potter CA
Health Phys; 2005 Jun; 88(6):565-78. PubMed ID: 15891454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE), quality factor (Q), and radiation weighting factor (w(R)). A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
Task Group on Radiation Quality Effects in Radiological Protection, Committee 1 on Radiation Effects, International Commission on Radiological Protection
Ann ICRP; 2003; 33(4):1-117. PubMed ID: 14614921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric quantities in radiological protection and risk assessment.
Menzel HG; Harrison J
J Radiol Prot; 2012 Mar; 32(1):N41-6. PubMed ID: 22395228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Name those quantities.
Strom DJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 108(3):183-5. PubMed ID: 15031440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. NRC absorbed dose reconstruction for family member of 131I therapy patient: case study and commentary.
Marcus CS; Siegel JA
J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):13N-6N, 37N. PubMed ID: 15073236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing dose of the representative person for the purpose of radiation protection of the public. ICRP publication 101. Approved by the Commission in September 2005.
ICRP
Ann ICRP; 2006; 36(3):vii-viii, 5-62. PubMed ID: 17174713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The present ICRP protection quantities are seriously flawed. Favouring the proposition.
Thomas RH; Edwards AA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 104(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 12862249
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers.
Boice JD; Leggett RW; Ellis ED; Wallace PW; Mumma M; Cohen SS; Brill AB; Chadda B; Boecker BB; Yoder RC; Eckerman KF
Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A modified ICRP 66 iodine gas uptake model and its parametric uncertainty.
Harvey RP; Hamby DM; Palmer TS;
Health Phys; 2004 Nov; 87(5):490-506. PubMed ID: 15551787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Weighting factors for radiation quality: how to unite the two current concepts.
Kellerer AM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):781-7. PubMed ID: 15353747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The present ICRP protection quantitites are seriously flawed. Opposing the proposition.
Edwards AA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 104(1):85-7. PubMed ID: 12862250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Occupational radiation exposure to norms in a gold mine.
Darko EO; Tetteh GK; Akaho EH
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(4):538-45. PubMed ID: 15914510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Fetus radiation doses from nuclear medicine and radiology diagnostic procedures. Potential risks and radiation protection instructions].
Markou P
Hell J Nucl Med; 2007; 10(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 17450255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of the ICRP's dose coefficients for members of the public. III. Plutonium as a case study of uncertainties in the systemic biokinetics of radionuclides.
Leggett RW
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(2):103-20. PubMed ID: 14653331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
