These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15511304)

  • 1. A multivariate projection-type analogue of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
    Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2004 Nov; 57(Pt 2):205-13. PubMed ID: 15511304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of profile-likelihood-based confidence intervals with other rank-based methods for the two-sample problem in ordered categorical data.
    Funatogawa I; Funatogawa T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2023 May; 33(3):371-385. PubMed ID: 36533908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Case for omitting tied observations in the two-sample t-test and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test.
    McGee M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200837. PubMed ID: 30040850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal sample size planning for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
    Happ M; Bathke AC; Brunner E
    Stat Med; 2019 Feb; 38(3):363-375. PubMed ID: 30298671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some results on extensions and modifications of the Theil-Sen regression estimator.
    Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2004 Nov; 57(Pt 2):265-80. PubMed ID: 15511308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Confidence intervals of the Mann-Whitney parameter that are compatible with the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
    Fay MP; Malinovsky Y
    Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(27):3991-4006. PubMed ID: 29984411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A simple and effective decision rule for choosing a significance test to protect against non-normality.
    Zimmerman DW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):388-409. PubMed ID: 21973093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When is the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney procedure a test of location? Implications for effect-size measures.
    Parker S; Jernigan RW; Lansky JM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):170-183. PubMed ID: 30900241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical significance levels of nonparametric tests biased by heterogeneous variances of treatment groups.
    Zimmerman DW
    J Gen Psychol; 2000 Oct; 127(4):354-64. PubMed ID: 11109998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test under scrutiny.
    Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(10):1487-97. PubMed ID: 19247980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal design of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-test.
    Bürkner PC; Doebler P; Holling H
    Biom J; 2017 Jan; 59(1):25-40. PubMed ID: 27243898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outlier removal, sum scores, and the inflation of the Type I error rate in independent samples t tests: the power of alternatives and recommendations.
    Bakker M; Wicherts JM
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Sep; 19(3):409-27. PubMed ID: 24773354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unadjusted Bivariate Two-Group Comparisons: When Simpler is Better.
    Vetter TR; Mascha EJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jan; 126(1):338-342. PubMed ID: 29189214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Power and sample size estimation for the Wilcoxon rank sum test with application to comparisons of C statistics from alternative prediction models.
    Rosner B; Glynn RJ
    Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):188-97. PubMed ID: 18510654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing two independent groups: a test based on a one-step M-estimator and bootstrap-t.
    Özdemir AF
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):322-37. PubMed ID: 22708512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental comparison of parametric versus nonparametric analyses of data from the cold pressor test.
    Treister R; Nielsen CS; Stubhaug A; Farrar JT; Pud D; Sawilowsky S; Oaklander AL
    J Pain; 2015 Jun; 16(6):537-48. PubMed ID: 25801300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test: stratify or not?
    Qu Y; Zhao YD; Rahardja D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(6):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18991110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Group sequential methods for the Mann-Whitney parameter.
    Nowak CP; Mütze T; Konietschke F
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2004-2020. PubMed ID: 35698787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size calculation for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test adjusting for ties.
    Zhao YD; Rahardja D; Qu Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(3):462-8. PubMed ID: 17487941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An optimal Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test of mortality and a continuous outcome.
    Matsouaka RA; Singhal AB; Betensky RA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2384-2400. PubMed ID: 27920364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.