BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15511648)

  • 1. Texture segmentation and visual search for pop-out targets. An ERP study.
    Schubö A; Schröger E; Meinecke C
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Nov; 21(3):317-34. PubMed ID: 15511648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual basis of redundancy gains in visual pop-out search.
    Töllner T; Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J; Müller HJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):137-50. PubMed ID: 20044891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting pop-out targets in contexts of varying homogeneity: investigating homogeneity coding with event-related brain potentials (ERPs).
    Schubö A; Wykowska A; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1138():136-47. PubMed ID: 17276413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
    Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological correlates of target eccentricity in texture segmentation.
    Schaffer S; Schubö A; Meinecke C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Jun; 80(3):198-209. PubMed ID: 21419177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The neural processing fate of singleton target and nontarget stimuli.
    Akyürek EG; Dinkelbach A; Schubö A
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1307():115-33. PubMed ID: 19833112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention.
    Hickey C; McDonald JJ; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):604-13. PubMed ID: 16768363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task difficulty modulates electrophysiological correlates of perceptual learning.
    Wang Y; Song Y; Qu Z; Ding Y
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 19969030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of negative attentional set upon target processing in RSVP: an ERP study.
    Zhang D; Zhou X; Martens S
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2604-14. PubMed ID: 19465037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence of independent facilitation by collinearity and similarity in texture grouping and segmentation.
    Casco C; Campana G; Han S; Guzzon D
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 19948107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The electrophysiological correlate of contour integration is modulated by task demands.
    Mathes B; Trenner D; Fahle M
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):98-112. PubMed ID: 16945355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Appearing and disappearing stimuli trigger a reflexive modulation of visual cortical activity.
    Hopfinger JB; Maxwell JS
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15907377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between local and global processing and the processing of high and low spatial frequencies studied by event-related potentials and source modeling.
    Boeschoten MA; Kemner C; Kenemans JL; Engeland Hv
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 15993761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An ERP study of visual change detection: effects of magnitude of spatial frequency changes on the change-related posterior positivity.
    Kimura M; Katayama J; Murohashi H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 16439032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological correlates of similarity-based interference during detection of visual forms.
    Conci M; Gramann K; Müller HJ; Elliott MA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jun; 18(6):880-8. PubMed ID: 16839296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
    Schubö A; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural substrates of visual perceptual learning of simple and complex stimuli.
    Song Y; Ding Y; Fan S; Qu Z; Xu L; Lu C; Peng D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 116(3):632-9. PubMed ID: 15721077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials.
    Correa A; Lupiáñez J; Madrid E; Tudela P
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1076(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 16516173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. P3a from visual stimuli: task difficulty effects.
    Hagen GF; Gatherwright JR; Lopez BA; Polich J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 16253363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.