65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15512138)
1. 'Expert' analysis of menstrual and ultrasound data in pregnancy--gestational dating.
Hutchon DJ
J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Sep; 18(5):435-8. PubMed ID: 15512138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Determination of the expected day of delivery--ultrasound has not been shown to be more accurate than the calendar method].
Olsen O; Clausen JA
Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Mar; 160(14):2088-90. PubMed ID: 9604677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical interpretation of ultrasound biometry for dating and for assessment of fetal growth using a wheel and chart: is it sufficiently accurate?
Hutchon DJ; Kearney C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Feb; 13(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 10079488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictors of the day of delivery in 15,000 examinations.
Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Sep; 8(3):178-85. PubMed ID: 8915087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimated date of delivery from last menstrual period and ultrasound scan: which is more accurate?
Rowlands S; Royston P
Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Aug; 43(373):322-5. PubMed ID: 8251215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The biologic error in gestational length related to the use of the first day of last menstrual period as a proxy for the start of pregnancy.
Nakling J; Buhaug H; Backe B
Early Hum Dev; 2005 Oct; 81(10):833-9. PubMed ID: 16084037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating the date of confinement: ultrasonographic biometry versus certain menstrual dates.
Mongelli M; Wilcox M; Gardosi J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jan; 174(1 Pt 1):278-81. PubMed ID: 8572021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How well does fetal ultrasound predict the date of birth in Antigua and Barbuda?
Martin TC; Miles RL; Edwards K
West Indian Med J; 2005 Mar; 54(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 15999882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determinants and consequences of discrepancies in menstrual and ultrasonographic gestational age estimates.
Morin I; Morin L; Zhang X; Platt RW; Blondel B; Bréart G; Usher R; Kramer MS
BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 15663577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Issues in pregnancy dating: revisiting the evidence.
Hunter LA
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2009; 54(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 19410210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of delivery date by sonography in the first and second trimesters.
Olesen AW; Thomsen SG
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 16865679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using ultrasonic fetal size measurements to estimate gestational age in Brisbane, Australia.
Schluter PJ; Pritchard G; Gill MA
Australas Radiol; 2007 Feb; 51(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 17217489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of recalled date of last menstrual period with prospectively recorded dates.
Wegienka G; Baird DD
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2005 Apr; 14(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 15857271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal crown-rump length and estimation of gestational age in an ethnic Chinese population.
Sahota DS; Leung TY; Leung TN; Chan OK; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 19115262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New and improved Israeli reference of birth weight, birth length, and head circumference by gestational age: a hospital-based study.
Davidson S; Sokolover N; Erlich A; Litwin A; Linder N; Sirota L
Isr Med Assoc J; 2008 Feb; 10(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 18432026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Calculation of gestational age. Methods and problems].
Matias A; Tiago P; Montenegro N
Acta Med Port; 2002; 15(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 12025447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies.
Sladkevicius P; Saltvedt S; Almström H; Kublickas M; Grunewald C; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 16149101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Discordant dating of pregnancy by LMP and ultrasound and its implications in perinatal statistics.
Sharma LK; Bindal J; Shrivastava VA; Sharma M; Choorakuttil RM; Nirmalan PK
Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2020; 30(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 32476747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Menstrual versus clinical estimate of gestational age dating in the United States: temporal trends and variability in indices of perinatal outcomes.
Ananth CV
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():22-30. PubMed ID: 17803615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fetal ultrasound biometry: normative charts for a Puerto Rican population.
de la Vega A; Ruiz-Febo N; Roberts ZC
P R Health Sci J; 2008 Mar; 27(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 18450238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
