These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15512756)

  • 1. Bone remodelling of a proximal femur with the thrust plate prosthesis: an in vitro case.
    Taylor WR; Ploeg H; Hertig D; Warner MD; Clift SE
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2004 Jun; 7(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 15512756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating the effect of remodelling signal type on the finite element based predictions of bone remodelling around the thrust plate prosthesis: a patient-specific comparison.
    Schmitz MJ; Clift SE; Taylor WR; Hertig D; Warner MD; Ploeg HL; Bereiter H
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2004; 218(6):417-24. PubMed ID: 15648665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Bone adaptation changes mechanical stress in the femur--a prospective two years follow up after Hüft-TEP implantation].
    Lengsfeld M; Günther D; Pressel T; Leppek R; Schmitt J; Griss P
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(5):526-30. PubMed ID: 14551838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bone remodelling around uncemented metallic and ceramic acetabular components.
    Ghosh R; Mukherjee K; Gupta S
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 May; 227(5):490-502. PubMed ID: 23637259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Numerical evaluation of bone remodelling and adaptation considering different hip prosthesis designs.
    Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Gubaua JE; Pereira JT
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Dec; 50():122-129. PubMed ID: 29100185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
    Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Ong KL; Kurtz SM; Manley MT; Rushton N; Mohammed NA; Field RE
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1110-5. PubMed ID: 16877617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental evaluation of new concepts in hip arthroplasty.
    Wik TS
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2012 Apr; 83(345):1-26. PubMed ID: 22489909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A different fixation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty may lead to preservation of femoral bone stock.
    Barink M; Verdonschot N; de Waal Malefijt M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 14558644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peri-implant bone remodeling after total hip replacement combined with systemic alendronate treatment: a finite element analysis.
    Peter B; Ramaniraka N; Rakotomanana LR; Zambelli PY; Pioletti DP
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2004 Apr; 7(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 15203955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. X-ray image review of the bone remodeling around an osseointegrated trans-femoral implant and a finite element simulation case study.
    Xu W; Robinson K
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 36(3):435-43. PubMed ID: 18197477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative analysis of different treatments for distal femur fractures using the finite element method.
    Cegoñino J; García Aznar JM; Doblaré M; Palanca D; Seral B; Seral F
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2004 Oct; 7(5):245-56. PubMed ID: 15621647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biphasic constitutive laws for biological interface evolution.
    Büchler P; Pioletti DP; Rakotomanana LR
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2003 Apr; 1(4):239-49. PubMed ID: 14586693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodelling.
    Kerner J; Huiskes R; van Lenthe GH; Weinans H; van Rietbergen B; Engh CA; Amis AA
    J Biomech; 1999 Jul; 32(7):695-703. PubMed ID: 10400357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Activity intensity, assistive devices and joint replacement influence predicted remodelling in the proximal femur.
    Dickinson AS
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Feb; 15(1):181-94. PubMed ID: 26183472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of acetabular cup size on the short-term stability of revision hip arthroplasty: a finite element investigation.
    Phillips AT; Pankaj ; Usmani AS; Howie CR
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2004; 218(4):239-49. PubMed ID: 15376726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of bone material properties on the initial stability of a cementless hip stem: a finite element study.
    Wong AS; New AM; Isaacs G; Taylor M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2005 Jul; 219(4):265-75. PubMed ID: 16050217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
    Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of mechanical stress and change in bone mineral density between two types of femoral implant using finite element analysis.
    Hirata Y; Inaba Y; Kobayashi N; Ike H; Fujimaki H; Saito T
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1731-5. PubMed ID: 23683518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of surgical position on interface stress and initial bone remodeling stimulus around hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Ong KL; Day JS; Kurtz SM; Field RE; Manley MT
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Oct; 24(7):1137-42. PubMed ID: 18823747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.