These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15513163)

  • 1. Cerebral asymmetries in the level of attention required for word recognition.
    Nicholls ME; Wood AG; Hayes L
    Laterality; 2001 Apr; 6(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 15513163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The contribution of attention to the right visual field advantage for word recognition.
    Nicholls ME; Wood AG
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Dec; 38(3):339-57. PubMed ID: 9841790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The neural basis of the right visual field advantage in reading: an MEG analysis using virtual electrodes.
    Barca L; Cornelissen P; Simpson M; Urooj U; Woods W; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2011 Sep; 118(3):53-71. PubMed ID: 20932563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Words, hemispheres, and dissociable subsystems: the effects of exposure duration, case alternation, priming, and continuity of form on word recognition in the left and right visual fields.
    Ellis AW; Ansorge L; Lavidor M
    Brain Lang; 2007 Dec; 103(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 17292463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemispheric asymmetry for word naming: effects of frequency and regularity of pronunciation.
    Scott GB; Hellige JB
    Laterality; 1998 Oct; 3(4):343-71. PubMed ID: 15513097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cerebral dominance and attentional bias in word recognition.
    Leventhal G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Jun; 66(3):791-800. PubMed ID: 3405703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequential processing in hemispheric word recognition: the impact of initial letter discriminability on the OUP naming effect.
    Lindell AK; Nicholls ME; Kwantes PJ; Castles A
    Brain Lang; 2005 May; 93(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15781304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of script direction on word processing modes in left and right visual fields.
    Siéroff E; Slama Y
    Laterality; 2018 Jul; 23(4):479-500. PubMed ID: 29141494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Asymmetries in the covert orienting of visual spatial attention to spatial and non-spatial cues in Alzheimer's disease.
    Maruff P; Malone V; Currie J
    Brain; 1995 Dec; 118 ( Pt 6)():1421-35. PubMed ID: 8595474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interhemispheric communication via direct connections for alternative meanings of ambiguous words.
    Collins M
    Brain Lang; 2002 Jan; 80(1):77-96. PubMed ID: 11817891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Length, formats, neighbours, hemispheres, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation.
    Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 14967218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Hemisphere asymmetry in repetitive priming and associative priming].
    Stief V; Schweinberger SR
    Z Exp Psychol; 1999; 46(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 10551041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemispheric differences in attentional orienting by social cues.
    Greene DJ; Zaidel E
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 21093465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
    Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automatic semantic priming in the left and right hemispheres.
    Korsnes MS; Magnussen S
    Scand J Psychol; 2007 Jun; 48(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 17518912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual field asymmetries in attention vary with self-reported attention deficits.
    Poynter W; Ingram P; Minor S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 19931966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does global context modulate cerebral asymmetries? A review and new evidence on word imageability effects.
    Chiarello C; Liu S; Shears C
    Brain Lang; 2001 Dec; 79(3):360-78. PubMed ID: 11781048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A transfer appropriate processing approach to investigating implicit memory for emotional words in the cerebral hemispheres.
    Collins MA; Cooke A
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(10):1529-45. PubMed ID: 15989942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.