210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15513246)
1. Feedforward and feedback consistency effects for high- and low-frequency words in lexical decision and naming.
Lacruz I; Folk J
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1261-84. PubMed ID: 15513246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: the body-object interaction effect.
Siakaluk PD; Pexman PM; Aguilera L; Owen WJ; Sears CR
Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):433-43. PubMed ID: 17258186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.
Hino Y; Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):686-713. PubMed ID: 12109762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.
Yap MJ; Balota DA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):274-96. PubMed ID: 17352611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Orthographic neighborhood and concreteness effects in the lexical decision task.
Samson D; Pillon A
Brain Lang; 2004 Nov; 91(2):252-64. PubMed ID: 15485714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cognitive effort and the word frequency effect in recognition and lexical decision.
Mutter SA; Hashtroudi S
Am J Psychol; 1987; 100(1):93-116. PubMed ID: 3592027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Concreteness and context availability in lexical decision tasks.
Levy-Drori S; Henik A
Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(1):45-65. PubMed ID: 16550855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
Mathey S
Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is there a neighborhood frequency effect in English? Evidence from reading and lexical decision.
Sears CR; Campbell CR; Lupker SJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):1040-62. PubMed ID: 16846296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007).
O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 17352625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feedback consistency effects in visual and auditory word recognition: where do we stand after more than a decade?
Ziegler JC; Petrova A; Ferrand L
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):643-61. PubMed ID: 18444762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The development of the orthographic consistency effect in speech recognition: from sublexical to lexical involvement.
Ventura P; Morais J; Kolinsky R
Cognition; 2007 Dec; 105(3):547-76. PubMed ID: 17250820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spelling consistency affects reading in young Dutch readers with and without dyslexia.
Bosman AM; Vonk W; van Zwam M
Ann Dyslexia; 2006 Dec; 56(2):271-300. PubMed ID: 17849201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semantic involvement in reading aloud: evidence from a nonword training study.
McKay A; Davis C; Savage G; Castles A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1495-517. PubMed ID: 18980410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of affective words on lexical decision task in major depression.
Stip E; Lecours AR; Chertkow H; Elie R; O'Connor K
J Psychiatry Neurosci; 1994 May; 19(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 8031744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dissociating the influence of familiarity and meaningfulness from word frequency in naming and lexical decision performance.
Colombo L; Pasini M; Balota DA
Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1312-24. PubMed ID: 17225511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task preferable to the yes/no task with developing readers?
Moret-Tatay C; Perea M
J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Sep; 110(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 21565360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: still a challenge for current word recognition models.
Ziegler JC; Jacobs AM; Klüppel D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):547-59. PubMed ID: 11424645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times.
Adelman JS; Brown GD; Quesada JF
Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):814-23. PubMed ID: 16984300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
