BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15513664)

  • 1. A Swedish cost-effectiveness analysis of community-based Chlamydia trachomatis PCR testing of postal urine specimens obtained at home.
    Novak DP; Lindholm L; Jonsson M; Karlsson RB
    Scand J Public Health; 2004; 32(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 15513664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening adolescent males for Chlamydia on admission to detention.
    Blake DR; Gaydos CA; Quinn TC
    Sex Transm Dis; 2004 Feb; 31(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 14743071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pooling of urine specimens allows accurate and cost-effective genetic detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Lithuania and other low-resource countries.
    Butylkina R; Juseviciute V; Kasparaviciene G; Vagoras A; Pagirskas E; Unemo M; Domeika M
    Scand J Infect Dis; 2007; 39(3):209-12. PubMed ID: 17366049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mailed urine samples are not an effective screening approach for Chlamydia trachomatis case finding among young men.
    Domeika M; Oscarsson L; Hallén A; Hjelm E; Sylvan S
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Jul; 21(6):789-94. PubMed ID: 17567309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of economics and acceptability of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection, in women attending antenatal, abortion, colposcopy and family planning clinics in Scotland, UK.
    Norman JE; Wu O; Twaddle S; Macmillan S; McMillan L; Templeton A; McKenzie H; Noone A; Allardice G; Reid M
    BJOG; 2004 Nov; 111(11):1261-8. PubMed ID: 15521872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnancy; cost-effectiveness favorable at a minimum prevalence rate of 3% or more].
    Postma MJ; Bakker A; Welte R; van Bergen JE; van den Hoek JA; de Jong-van den Berg LT; Jager JC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Dec; 144(49):2350-4. PubMed ID: 11129971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A cost-effectiveness analysis of the Chlamydia Monday--a community-based intervention to decrease the prevalence of chlamydia in Sweden.
    Deogan CL; Bocangel MK; Wamala SP; Månsdotter AM
    Scand J Public Health; 2010 Mar; 38(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 20064921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening of Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital infections among the male and female population of the Republic of Macedonia.
    Spasovski MS; Simjanovska LJ; Taleski V; Petrova N; Lazetic L; Popeska Z; Gaydos CA; Quinn TC; Efremov GD
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2005 Jul; 19(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 15987287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Ligase chain reaction testing of pooled urine specimens to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis infection].
    Sánchez-Alemán MA; Gutiérrez JP; Bertozzi SM; Frontela-Noda M; Guerrero-Lemus V; Conde-González CJ
    Rev Invest Clin; 2005; 57(4):548-54. PubMed ID: 16315639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection: cost-effectiveness favorable at a minimum prevalence rate of 3% or more].
    Habets PC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Mar; 145(10):499-501. PubMed ID: 11268916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel gel-based method for self-collection and ambient temperature postal transport of urine for PCR detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Bialasiewicz S; Whiley DM; Buhrer-Skinner M; Bautista C; Barker K; Aitken S; Gordon R; Muller R; Lambert SB; Debattista J; Nissen MD; Sloots TP
    Sex Transm Infect; 2009 Apr; 85(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 19004866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Potentials of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in Hungary: cost-benefit analysis].
    Nyári T; Mészáros G; Deák J; Nagy E; Kovács L
    Orv Hetil; 2000 Jul; 141(27):1511-6. PubMed ID: 10943109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pooling samples: the key to sensitive, specific and cost-effective genetic diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in low-resource countries.
    Shipitsyna E; Shalepo K; Savicheva A; Unemo M; Domeika M
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2007; 87(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 17340020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
    Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA; Jager JC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):677-81. PubMed ID: 10321301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Urine-based testing for Chlamydia trachomatis using polymerase chain reaction, leucocyte esterase and urethral and cervical smears.
    Coble BI; Nordahl-Akesson E; Vinnerberg A; Kihlström E
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2006; 66(4):269-77. PubMed ID: 16777755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cost-based decision analysis for Chlamydia screening in California family planning clinics.
    Trachtenberg AI; Washington AE; Halldorson S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jan; 71(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 3122137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The program cost and cost-effectiveness of screening men for Chlamydia to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease in women.
    Gift TL; Gaydos CA; Kent CK; Marrazzo JM; Rietmeijer CA; Schillinger JA; Dunne EF
    Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Nov; 35(11 Suppl):S66-75. PubMed ID: 18830137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modelling the impact of opportunistic screening on the sequelae and public healthcare costs of infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in Australian women.
    Ward B; Rodger AJ; Jackson TJ
    Public Health; 2006 Jan; 120(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 16271271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of pooled urine samples and automated DNA isolation to achieve improved sensitivity and cost-effectiveness of large-scale testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women.
    Rours GI; Verkooyen RP; Willemse HF; van der Zwaan EA; van Belkum A; de Groot R; Verbrugh HA; Ossewaarde JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Sep; 43(9):4684-90. PubMed ID: 16145127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Population-based outreach for Chlamydia screening in men: results from a randomized trial.
    Scholes D; Heidrich FE; Yarbro P; Lindenbaum JE; Marrazzo JM
    Sex Transm Dis; 2007 Nov; 34(11):837-9. PubMed ID: 17538514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.