These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Reproductive tourism as moral pluralism in motion. Pennings G J Med Ethics; 2002 Dec; 28(6):337-41. PubMed ID: 12468650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Where does a man stand on issues of assisted reproduction, surrogacy, artificial insemination within lesbian relationships and posthumous conception? Beem P Aust J Fam Law; 2004 Apr; 18(1):41-62. PubMed ID: 17058336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Present state of reproductive medicine in Japan - ethical issues with a focus on those seen in court cases. Mayeda M BMC Med Ethics; 2006 Apr; 7():E3. PubMed ID: 16597339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The consequences of S.H. and Others v. Austria for legislation on gamete donation in Europe: an ethical analysis of the European Court of Human Rights judgments. Van Hoof W; Pennings G Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Dec; 25(7):665-9. PubMed ID: 23063819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is Europe 'giving in to baby markets?' Reproductive tourism in Europe and the gradual erosion of existing legal limits to reproductive markets. Van Beers BC Med Law Rev; 2015; 23(1):103-34. PubMed ID: 24866180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomedical value conflict. Tranoy KE Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(4):S8-10. PubMed ID: 11650805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Current issues in medically assisted reproduction and genetics in Europe: research, clinical practice, ethics, legal issues and policy. Harper J; Geraedts J; Borry P; Cornel MC; Dondorp WJ; Gianaroli L; Harton G; Milachich T; Kääriäinen H; Liebaers I; Morris M; Sequeiros J; Sermon K; Shenfield F; Skirton H; Soini S; Spits C; Veiga A; Vermeesch JR; Viville S; de Wert G; Macek M; Hum Reprod; 2014 Aug; 29(8):1603-9. PubMed ID: 25006203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statutory prohibitions and the regulation of new reproductive technologies under federal law in Canada. Healy P McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):905-46. PubMed ID: 11654474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal tissue transplants. Robertson JA Wash Univ Law Q; 1988; 66(3):443-98. PubMed ID: 11659170 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reconciling reason and religion: on Dworkin and religious freedom. Stacy T George Washington Law Rev; 1994 Nov; 63(1):1-75. PubMed ID: 11660276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Circumvention tourism. Cohen G Cornell Law Rev; 2012 Sep; 97(6):1309-98. PubMed ID: 23072007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medically mediated reproduction: posthumous conception and the best interests of the child. Pobjoy J J Law Med; 2007 Dec; 15(3):450-68. PubMed ID: 18251427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Posthumous reproduction. Robertson JA Indiana Law J; 1994; 69(4):1027-65. PubMed ID: 11653158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Children by choice: reproductive technologies and the boundaries of personal autonomy. Charo RA Nat Cell Biol; 2002 Oct; 4 Suppl():s23-8. PubMed ID: 12479611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bill to regulate fertility procedures gains in Italy. Stanley A N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():A4. PubMed ID: 11648127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion rights in America. Bullock JR Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]