These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15514075)

  • 1. Analysis of the estimators of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.
    Fernández B; García-Dorado A; Caballero A
    Genetics; 2004 Oct; 168(2):1053-69. PubMed ID: 15514075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of antagonistic pleiotropy on the estimation of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.
    Fernández B; García-Dorado A; Caballero A
    Genetics; 2005 Dec; 171(4):2097-112. PubMed ID: 16118193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of the biases in the estimation of deleterious mutation parameters from natural populations at mutation-selection balance.
    Caballero A
    Genet Res; 2006 Dec; 88(3):177-89. PubMed ID: 17371612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of deleterious-mutation parameters in natural populations.
    Deng HW; Lynch M
    Genetics; 1996 Sep; 144(1):349-60. PubMed ID: 8878698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of the upper limit of the mutation rate and mean heterozygous effect of deleterious mutations.
    Caballero A
    Genet Res; 2006 Dec; 88(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 17371608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift versus nonrandom mating.
    Glémin S
    Evolution; 2003 Dec; 57(12):2678-87. PubMed ID: 14761049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selection and drift in subdivided populations: a straightforward method for deriving diffusion approximations and applications involving dominance, selfing and local extinctions.
    Roze D; Rousset F
    Genetics; 2003 Dec; 165(4):2153-66. PubMed ID: 14704194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious spontaneous mutations.
    García-Dorado A; Caballero A
    Genetics; 2000 Aug; 155(4):1991-2001. PubMed ID: 10924491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of overdominance on characterizing deleterious mutations in large natural populations.
    Li JL; Li J; Deng HW
    Genetics; 1999 Feb; 151(2):895-913. PubMed ID: 9927478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simple, semi-deterministic approximation to the distribution of selective sweeps in large populations.
    Martin G; Lambert A
    Theor Popul Biol; 2015 May; 101():40-6. PubMed ID: 25724404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating selection on nonsynonymous mutations.
    Loewe L; Charlesworth B; Bartolomé C; Nöel V
    Genetics; 2006 Feb; 172(2):1079-92. PubMed ID: 16299397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of the rate and effects of deleterious genomic mutations in finite populations with linkage disequilibrium.
    Li J; Deng HW
    Heredity (Edinb); 2005 Jul; 95(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 15931248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mutation-selection balance and mixed mating with asexual reproduction.
    Marriage TN; Orive ME
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Sep; 308():25-35. PubMed ID: 22652003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The action of stabilizing selection, mutation, and drift on epistatic quantitative traits.
    Avila V; Pérez-Figueroa A; Caballero A; Hill WG; García-Dorado A; López-Fanjul C
    Evolution; 2014 Jul; 68(7):1974-87. PubMed ID: 24689841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do genetic drift and accumulation of deleterious mutations preclude adaptation? Empirical investigation using RADseq in a northern lacustrine fish.
    Perrier C; Ferchaud AL; Sirois P; Thibault I; Bernatchez L
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Nov; 26(22):6317-6335. PubMed ID: 29024140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence for diploid selection models with arbitrary dominance.
    Williamson S; Fledel-Alon A; Bustamante CD
    Genetics; 2004 Sep; 168(1):463-75. PubMed ID: 15454557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The distribution of deleterious genetic variation in human populations.
    Lohmueller KE
    Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2014 Dec; 29():139-46. PubMed ID: 25461617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of drift, selection and recombination on the equilibrium frequency of deleterious mutations.
    John S; Jain K
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Jan; 365():238-46. PubMed ID: 25451760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accumulation of deleterious mutations in small abiotic populations of RNA.
    Soll SJ; Díaz Arenas C; Lehman N
    Genetics; 2007 Jan; 175(1):267-75. PubMed ID: 17110480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Note on the computation of critical effective population sizes.
    Zhang L; Watson LT
    J Comput Biol; 2007 Sep; 14(7):950-60. PubMed ID: 17803372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.