These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15517091)

  • 1. The reliability of the Brazilian version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 2.1).
    Quintana MI; Andreoli SB; Jorge MR; Gastal FL; Miranda CT
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2004 Nov; 37(11):1739-45. PubMed ID: 15517091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity and limitations of the Brazilian version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 2.1).
    Quintana MI; Gastal FL; Jorge MR; Miranda CT; Andreoli SB
    Braz J Psychiatry; 2007 Mar; 29(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17435922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Concordance of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) with standardized clinical assessments in the WHO World Mental Health surveys.
    Haro JM; Arbabzadeh-Bouchez S; Brugha TS; de Girolamo G; Guyer ME; Jin R; Lepine JP; Mazzi F; Reneses B; Vilagut G; Sampson NA; Kessler RC
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2006; 15(4):167-80. PubMed ID: 17266013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS): inter-rater and test-retest reliability and validity in a Spanish population.
    Roca M; Martin-Santos R; Saiz J; Obiols J; Serrano MJ; Torrens M; Subirà S; Gili M; Navinés R; Ibañez A; Nadal M; Barrantes N; Cañellas F
    Eur Psychiatry; 2007 Jan; 22(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 17188842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and feasibility of the computerized Turkish edition of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview [DIA-X/CIDI version 2.8(TR)].
    Dingoyan D; Mösko M; Imamoğlu Y; von Wolff A; Strehle J; Wittchen HU; Schulz H; Koch-Gromus U; Heinz A; Kluge U
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2017 Sep; 26(3):. PubMed ID: 27766697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Test-retest reliability of the computerized DSM-IV version of the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI).
    Wittchen HU; Lachner G; Wunderlich U; Pfister H
    Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 1998 Nov; 33(11):568-78. PubMed ID: 9803825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The Composite International Diagnostic Interview: possibilities of utilization for economic studies in psychiatry].
    Kiejna A; Grzesiak M; Kantorska-Janiec M
    Psychiatr Pol; 1998; 32(4):463-79. PubMed ID: 9816904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of Chinese Version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 in Psychiatric Settings.
    Lu J; Huang YQ; Liu ZR; Cao XL
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Sep; 128(18):2462-6. PubMed ID: 26365963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One-year test-retest reliability of a Japanese web-based version of the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) for major depression in a working population.
    Shimoda H; Inoue A; Tsuno K; Kawakami N
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2015 Sep; 24(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 24677699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Adaptation and Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5-Disorders - Clinician Version (SCID-5/CV) to the Turkish Language].
    Elbir M; Alp Topbaş Ö; Bayad S; Kocabaş T; Topak OZ; Çetin Ş; Özdel O; Ateşçi F; Aydemir Ö
    Turk Psikiyatri Derg; 2019; 30(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 31170307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-5 (AUDADIS-5): procedural validity of substance use disorders modules through clinical re-appraisal in a general population sample.
    Hasin DS; Greenstein E; Aivadyan C; Stohl M; Aharonovich E; Saha T; Goldstein R; Nunes EV; Jung J; Zhang H; Grant BF
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2015 Mar; 148():40-6. PubMed ID: 25604321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of two survey diagnostic interviews among primary care attendees: a comparison of CIS-R and CIDI with SCAN ICD-10 diagnostic categories.
    Jordanova V; Wickramesinghe C; Gerada C; Prince M
    Psychol Med; 2004 Aug; 34(6):1013-24. PubMed ID: 15554572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Multi-centre clinical assessment of the Russian language version of the Diagnostic Interview for Psychoses].
    Smirnova DA; Petrova NN; Pavlichenko AV; Martynikhin IA; Dorofeikova MV; Eremkin VI; Izmailova OV; Osadshiy YY; Romanov DV; Ubeikon DA; Fedotov IA; Sheifer MS; Shustov AD; Yashikhina AA; Clark M; Badcock J; Watterreus A; Morgan V; Jablensky A
    Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 2018; 118(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 29460905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of two structured diagnostic interviews: CIDI and SCAN.
    Andrews G; Peters L; Guzman AM; Bird K
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1995 Mar; 29(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 7625961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Korean version of the diagnostic interview for genetic studies: Validity and reliability.
    Joo EJ; Joo YH; Hong JP; Hwang S; Maeng SJ; Han JH; Yang BH; Lee YS; Kim YS
    Compr Psychiatry; 2004; 45(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 15124154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI-Auto) with clinical assessment in diagnosing mood and anxiety disorders.
    Komiti AA; Jackson HJ; Judd FK; Cockram AM; Kyrios M; Yeatman R; Murray G; Hordern C; Wainwright K; Allen N; Singh B
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2001 Apr; 35(2):224-30. PubMed ID: 11284905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical reappraisal of the composite international diagnostic interview version 3.3 in Qatar's National Mental Health Study.
    Khaled SM; Amro I; Abdelkader M; Al Bahari D; Al Shawwaf M; Alabdulla M; Alhassan A; Ali A; Aly S; Amin A; Chiu WT; Currie J; El Fakki H; First MB; Hassan MHO; Hijawi Z; Mohammed R; Nofal M; Salman S; Sampson NA; Woodruff PW; Kessler RC
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2024 May; 33(S1):e2013. PubMed ID: 38726881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test-retest reliability of the computer-assisted DIA-X-5 interview for mental disorders.
    Hoyer J; Voss C; Strehle J; Venz J; Pieper L; Wittchen HU; Ehrlich S; Beesdo-Baum K
    BMC Psychiatry; 2020 Jun; 20(1):280. PubMed ID: 32503463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring symptoms and diagnosing mental disorders in the elderly community: the test-retest reliability of the CIDI65.
    Wittchen HU; Strehle J; Gerschler A; Volkert J; Dehoust MC; Sehner S; Wegscheider K; Ausìn B; Canuto A; Crawford M; Da Ronch C; Grassi L; Hershkovitz Y; Munoz M; Quirk A; Rotenstein O; Santos-Olmo AB; Shalev A; Weber K; Schulz H; Härter M; Andreas S
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2015 Jun; 24(2):116-29. PubMed ID: 25308743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structure, content and reliability of the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI) substance use sections.
    Lachner G; Wittchen HU; Perkonigg A; Holly A; Schuster P; Wunderlich U; Türk D; Garczynski E; Pfister H
    Eur Addict Res; 1998 Mar; 4(1-2):28-41. PubMed ID: 9740815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.