101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15517556)
21. Cost-effectiveness of different treatment strategies with intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent early-onset group B streptococcal disease.
Akker-van Marle ME; Rijnders ME; Dommelen P; Fekkes M; Wouwe JP; Amelink-Verburg MP; Verkerk PH
BJOG; 2005 Jun; 112(6):820-6. PubMed ID: 15924544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. First trimester ultrasonography in screening and detection of fetal anomalies.
Sonek J
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2007 Feb; 145C(1):45-61. PubMed ID: 17304542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of a genetic screening program in the close relatives of Spanish patients with familial hypercholesterolemia].
Oliva J; López-Bastida J; Moreno SG; Mata P; Alonso R
Rev Esp Cardiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 19150015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Costs and effects of prenatal screening methods for Down syndrome and neural tube defects.
Hoogendoorn M; Evers SM; Schielen PC; van Genugten ML; de Wit GA; Ament AJ
Community Genet; 2008; 11(6):359-67. PubMed ID: 18690004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Acute coronary syndromes in Europe: 1-year costs and outcomes.
Taylor MJ; Scuffham PA; McCollam PL; Newby DE
Curr Med Res Opin; 2007 Mar; 23(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 17355731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Women as moral pioneers? Experiences of first trimester antenatal screening.
Williams C; Sandall J; Lewando-Hundt G; Heyman B; Spencer K; Grellier R
Soc Sci Med; 2005 Nov; 61(9):1983-92. PubMed ID: 15899542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Routine prenatal ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities: 22 years' experience.
Carrera JM; Torrents M; Mortera C; Cusí V; Muñoz A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Mar; 5(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 7788491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Antenatal ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities: a systematic review of studies of cost and cost effectiveness.
Roberts T; Henderson J; Mugford M; Bricker L; Neilson J; Garcia J
BJOG; 2002 Jan; 109(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 11843373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ethical dimensions of ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Jun; 847():185-90. PubMed ID: 9668711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Routine fetal ultrasound: a billion dollar baby?
Bieze J
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1994 Mar; 16(3):65-74. PubMed ID: 10146688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Analysis of the cost effectiveness of different strategies for the antenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aberrations in cases of ultrasound-identified fetal abnormalities.
Mourgues C; Eymard-Pierre E; Laurichesse-Delmas H; Gerbaud L; Gouas L; Pébrel-Richard C; Vago P; Debost-Legrand A; Goumy C
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2020 Oct; 78(5):483-491. PubMed ID: 32933889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost issues surrounding the use of computerized telemedicine for obstetric ultrasonography.
Malone FD; Athanassiou A; Craigo SD; Simpson LL; D'Alton ME
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Aug; 12(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 9744057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Ultrasound screening for birth defects: A medico-economic review].
Ferrier C; Dhombres F; Guilbaud L; Durand-Zaleski I; Jouannic JM
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017; 45(7-8):408-415. PubMed ID: 28720225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [The development of obstetric ultrasound in Switzerland].
Zimmermann R
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2005 Apr; 45(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 15818049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Early Detection of Fetal Malformation, a Long Distance Yet to Cover! Present Status and Potential of First Trimester Ultrasonography in Detection of Fetal Congenital Malformation in a Developing Country: Experience at a Tertiary Care Centre in India.
Kashyap N; Pradhan M; Singh N; Yadav S
J Pregnancy; 2015; 2015():623059. PubMed ID: 26759727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sensitivity and specificity of routine antenatal screening for congenital anomalies by ultrasound: the Belgian Multicentric Study.
Levi S; Hyjazi Y; Schaapst JP; Defoort P; Coulon R; Buekens P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Mar; 1(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 12797083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Financial implications of routine screening ultrasound.
DeVore GR
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 May; 7(5):307-8. PubMed ID: 8774093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparative study of routine versus selective fetal anomaly ultrasound scanning.
Long G; Sprigg A
J Med Screen; 1998; 5(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 9575451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cost-effectiveness of one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a report from the Helsinki ultrasound trial.
Leivo T; Tuominen R; Saari-Kemppainen A; Ylöstalo P; Karjalainen O; Heinonen OP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 May; 7(5):309-14. PubMed ID: 8774094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Can decision analysis help us decide whether ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies is worth it?
Romano PS; Waitzman NJ
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Jun; 847():154-72. PubMed ID: 9668708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
