297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15517676)
1. Uterine preservation during surgery for uterovaginal prolapse: a review.
Diwan A; Rardin CR; Kohli N
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2004; 15(4):286-92. PubMed ID: 15517676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D;
JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does the uterus need to be removed to correct uterovaginal prolapse?
Gutman RE
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 28(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 27467823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament uterine suspension compared with vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal vault suspension for uterovaginal prolapse.
Diwan A; Rardin CR; Strohsnitter WC; Weld A; Rosenblatt P; Kohli N
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2006 Jan; 17(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 15997364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and validation of the Value of Uterus instrument and visual analog scale to measure patients' valuation of their uterus.
Chang OH; Walters MD; Yao M; Lapin B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Nov; 227(5):746.e1-746.e9. PubMed ID: 35764134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does prolapse equal hysterectomy? The role of uterine conservation in women with uterovaginal prolapse.
Ridgeway BM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 213(6):802-9. PubMed ID: 26226554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Design of a Randomized Trial of Vaginal Surgery for Uterovaginal Prolapse: Vaginal Hysterectomy With Native Tissue Vault Suspension Versus Mesh Hysteropexy Suspension (The Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures Randomized Trial).
Nager CW; Zyczynski H; Rogers RG; Barber MD; Richter HE; Visco AG; Rardin CR; Harvie H; Wallace D; Meikle SF;
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(4):182-9. PubMed ID: 27054798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A multicenter, prospective trial to evaluate mesh-augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse.
Jirschele K; Seitz M; Zhou Y; Rosenblatt P; Culligan P; Sand P
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 May; 26(5):743-8. PubMed ID: 25394892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse.
Price N; Slack A; Jackson SR
BJOG; 2010 Jan; 117(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 20002370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence-Based Review of Vaginal Native Tissue Hysteropexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse.
Hoke TP; Tan-Kim J; Richter HE
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2019 Jul; 74(7):429-435. PubMed ID: 31343708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vaginal hysterectomy for the prolapsed uterus.
Lucero M; Shah AD
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 53(1):26-39. PubMed ID: 20142641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hysteropexy: an Option for the Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Bradley S; Gutman RE; Richter LA
Curr Urol Rep; 2018 Feb; 19(2):15. PubMed ID: 29476274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective randomized pilot study.
Rahmanou P; Price N; Jackson SR
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1687-94. PubMed ID: 26142347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Practice patterns of general gynecologic surgeons versus gynecologic subspecialists for concomitant apical suspension during vaginal hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse.
Yurteri-Kaplan LA; Mete MM; St Clair C; Iglesia CB
South Med J; 2015 Jan; 108(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 25580752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.
Kapoor S; Sivanesan K; Robertson JA; Veerasingham M; Kapoor V
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1285-1294. PubMed ID: 28258346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conservation of the prolapsed uterus is a valid option: medium term results of a prospective comparative study with the posterior intravaginal slingoplasty operation.
Neuman M; Lavy Y
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2007 Aug; 18(8):889-93. PubMed ID: 17136484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
