These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15518938)

  • 1. Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: the N2/P3 complex further validated.
    Ramautar JR; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Nov; 56(2):234-52. PubMed ID: 15518938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task.
    Kok A; Ramautar JR; De Ruiter MB; Band GP; Ridderinkhof KR
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Jan; 41(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 14692996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
    Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of stop-signal modality on the N2/P3 complex elicited in the stop-signal paradigm.
    Ramautar JR; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Apr; 72(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 16157441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Probability effects in the stop-signal paradigm: the insula and the significance of failed inhibition.
    Ramautar JR; Slagter HA; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):143-54. PubMed ID: 16616048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiological activity underlying inhibitory control processes in normal adults.
    Schmajuk M; Liotti M; Busse L; Woldorff MG
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(3):384-95. PubMed ID: 16095637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Additive factors analysis of inhibitory processing in the stop-signal paradigm.
    van den Wildenberg WP; van der Molen MW
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Nov; 56(2):253-66. PubMed ID: 15518939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Behavioural and ERP indices of response inhibition during a Stop-signal task in children with two subtypes of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Oct; 66(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 17604142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural correlates of successful and partial inhibitions in children: an ERP study.
    Cragg L; Fox A; Nation K; Reid C; Anderson M
    Dev Psychobiol; 2009 Nov; 51(7):533-43. PubMed ID: 19685486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The pure electrophysiology of stopping.
    Bekker EM; Kenemans JL; Hoeksma MR; Talsma D; Verbaten MN
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2005 Feb; 55(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15649550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of fetal alcohol syndrome on response execution and inhibition: an event-related potential study.
    Burden MJ; Andrew C; Saint-Amour D; Meintjes EM; Molteno CD; Hoyme HE; Robinson LK; Khaole N; Nelson CA; Jacobson JL; Jacobson SW
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2009 Nov; 33(11):1994-2004. PubMed ID: 19719791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrophysiological correlates of behavioral response inhibition in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
    Kim MS; Kim YY; Yoo SY; Kwon JS
    Depress Anxiety; 2007; 24(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 16933318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/NoGo task.
    Tian Y; Yao D
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 18524452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of varying stop-signal probability on ERPs in the stop-signal task: do they reflect variations in inhibitory processing or simply novelty effects?
    Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Mar; 77(3):324-36. PubMed ID: 18096294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When 'go' and 'nogo' are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography.
    Lavric A; Pizzagalli DA; Forstmeier S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 20(9):2483-8. PubMed ID: 15525290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural mechanisms underlying trait impulsivity in non-clinical adults: stop-signal performance and event-related potentials.
    Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2007 Mar; 31(2):443-54. PubMed ID: 17175083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamics of response-conflict monitoring and individual differences in response control and behavioral control: an electrophysiological investigation using a stop-signal task.
    Stahl J; Gibbons H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):581-96. PubMed ID: 17188565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.