287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15519022)
21. Comparison of multidetector 64-slice computed tomographic angiography to coronary angiography to assess the patency of coronary artery bypass grafts.
Jabara R; Chronos N; Klein L; Eisenberg S; Allen R; Bradford S; Frohwein S
Am J Cardiol; 2007 Jun; 99(11):1529-34. PubMed ID: 17531575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Differentiation of myocardial ischemia and infarction assessed by dynamic computed tomography perfusion imaging and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography.
Tanabe Y; Kido T; Uetani T; Kurata A; Kono T; Ogimoto A; Miyagawa M; Soma T; Murase K; Iwaki H; Mochizuki T
Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):3790-3801. PubMed ID: 26852220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Magnetic resonance adenosine perfusion imaging in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Klein C; Nagel E; Gebker R; Kelle S; Schnackenburg B; Graf K; Dreysse S; Fleck E
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Apr; 2(4):437-45. PubMed ID: 19580726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Relation of myocardial perfusion defects and nonsignificant coronary lesions by angiography with insights from intravascular ultrasound and coronary pressure measurements.
Rodés-Cabau J; Candell-Riera J; Angel J; de León G; Pereztol O; Castell-Conesa J; Soto A; Anívarro I; Aguadé S; Vázquez M; Domingo E; Tardif JC; Soler-Soler J
Am J Cardiol; 2005 Dec; 96(12):1621-6. PubMed ID: 16360346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial.
Schwitter J; Wacker CM; Wilke N; Al-Saadi N; Sauer E; Huettle K; Schönberg SO; Luchner A; Strohm O; Ahlstrom H; Dill T; Hoebel N; Simor T;
Eur Heart J; 2013 Mar; 34(10):775-81. PubMed ID: 22390914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance stress perfusion testing for the detection of coronary artery disease in women.
Klem I; Greulich S; Heitner JF; Kim H; Vogelsberg H; Kispert EM; Ambati SR; Bruch C; Parker M; Judd RM; Kim RJ; Sechtem U
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Jul; 1(4):436-45. PubMed ID: 19356464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of pressure measurement, dobutamine contrast stress echocardiography and SPECT for the evaluation of intermediate coronary stenoses. The COMPRESS trial.
Rieber J; Jung P; Erhard I; Koenig A; Hacker M; Schiele TM; Segmiller T; Stempfle HU; Theisen K; Siebert U; Klauss V
Int J Cardiovasc Intervent; 2004; 6(3-4):142-7. PubMed ID: 16146908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply.
Ruzsics B; Schwarz F; Schoepf UJ; Lee YS; Bastarrika G; Chiaramida SA; Costello P; Zwerner PL
Am J Cardiol; 2009 Aug; 104(3):318-26. PubMed ID: 19616661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intracoronary Doppler guide wire versus stress single-photon emission computed tomographic thallium-201 imaging in assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses.
Joye JD; Schulman DS; Lasorda D; Farah T; Donohue BC; Reichek N
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Oct; 24(4):940-7. PubMed ID: 7930228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical usefulness of combinatorial protocol with stress only myocardial perfusion SPECT, CTA and SPECT/CTA 3-dimensional fusion image.
Kong EJ; Cho IH; Chun KA
Ann Nucl Med; 2011 Jul; 25(6):387-95. PubMed ID: 21547475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Graft flow assessment using a transit time flow meter in fractional flow reserve-guided coronary artery bypass surgery.
Honda K; Okamura Y; Nishimura Y; Uchita S; Yuzaki M; Kaneko M; Yamamoto N; Kubo T; Akasaka T
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jun; 149(6):1622-8. PubMed ID: 25840755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cardiac magnetic resonance performs better in the detection of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis compared to single-photon emission computed tomography and dobutamine stress echocardiography.
Kamiya K; Sakakibara M; Asakawa N; Yamada S; Yoshitani T; Iwano H; Komatsu H; Naya M; Chiba S; Yamada S; Manabe O; Kikuchi Y; Oyama-Manabe N; Oba K; Tsutsui H
Circ J; 2014; 78(10):2468-76. PubMed ID: 25109426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease from the Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary Heart Disease (CE-MARC) Trial.
Greenwood JP; Motwani M; Maredia N; Brown JM; Everett CC; Nixon J; Bijsterveld P; Dickinson CJ; Ball SG; Plein S
Circulation; 2014 Mar; 129(10):1129-38. PubMed ID: 24357404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of saphenous vein coronary artery bypass graft flow by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Salm LP; Vliegen HW; Langerak SE; Bax JJ; Jukema JW; Lamb HJ; de Roos A; van der Wall EE; Zwinderman AH
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2005; 7(4):631-7. PubMed ID: 16136852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Combining FDG-PET and 99mTc-SPECT to predict functional outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery.
Lehtinen M; Schildt J; Ahonen A; Nikkinen P; Lauerma K; Sinisalo J; Kankuri E; Vento A; Pätilä T; Harjula A;
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Sep; 16(9):1023-30. PubMed ID: 25762563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency: assessment with high-resolution submillimeter 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) versus coronary angiography.
Anders K; Baum U; Schmid M; Ropers D; Schmid A; Pohle K; Daniel WG; Bautz W; Achenbach S
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 16446072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Navigator-gated 3D blood oxygen level-dependent CMR at 3.0-T for detection of stress-induced myocardial ischemic reactions.
Jahnke C; Gebker R; Manka R; Schnackenburg B; Fleck E; Paetsch I
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Apr; 3(4):375-84. PubMed ID: 20394899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comprehensive assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting by 16-detector-row computed tomography.
Salm LP; Bax JJ; Jukema JW; Schuijf JD; Vliegen HW; Lamb HJ; van der Wall EE; de Roos A
Am Heart J; 2005 Oct; 150(4):775-81. PubMed ID: 16209981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Findings of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography and Its Relation with Quantitative Coronary Angiography in Patients with Significant Stenosis of the Left Main Coronary Artery.
Kim HL; Oh SW; Lee H; Kim HJ; Kim YN; Lim WH; Seo JB; Kim SH; Kim MA; Zo JH
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 29354006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Functional and perfusional assessment with electrocardiograph-gated single photon emission computed tomography after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting.
Nishizaki K; Kameda Y; Kawata T; Mizuguchi K; Imai T; Taniguchi S
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Apr; 7(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 11371279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
