These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15519022)

  • 41. Value of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing patency and function of coronary artery bypass grafts. An angiographically controlled study.
    Galjee MA; van Rossum AC; Doesburg T; van Eenige MJ; Visser CA
    Circulation; 1996 Feb; 93(4):660-6. PubMed ID: 8640993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance and multidetector computed tomography stress-rest perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease.
    Bettencourt N; Chiribiri A; Schuster A; Ferreira N; Sampaio F; Pires-Morais G; Santos L; Melica B; Rodrigues A; Braga P; Azevedo L; Teixeira M; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Mar; 61(10):1099-107. PubMed ID: 23375929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Invasive versus noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease.
    Schuijf JD; van Werkhoven JM; Pundziute G; Jukema JW; Decramer I; Stokkel MP; Dibbets-Schneider P; Schalij MJ; Reiber JH; van der Wall EE; Wijns W; Bax JJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Mar; 1(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 19356428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis.
    Takx RA; Blomberg BA; El Aidi H; Habets J; de Jong PA; Nagel E; Hoffmann U; Leiner T
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Predictive value of a positive stress single-photon emission computed tomography or stress cardiac magnetic resonance for ruling in obstructive coronary artery disease in a real-world setting.
    Silva C; Lopes P; Gonçalves M; Ventosa A; Calqueiro J; Freitas P; Guerreiro S; Brito J; Abecasis J; Raposo L; Saraiva C; de Araújo Gonçalves P; Santos A; Campante Teles R; de Sousa Almeida M; Ferreira AM
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2023 Sep; 42(9):787-793. PubMed ID: 37257584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging detects anatomic and physiologic coronary artery disease as measured by coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.
    Costa MA; Shoemaker S; Futamatsu H; Klassen C; Angiolillo DJ; Nguyen M; Siuciak A; Gilmore P; Zenni MM; Guzman L; Bass TA; Wilke N
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Aug; 50(6):514-22. PubMed ID: 17678734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Coronary artery disease: which degree of coronary artery stenosis is indicative of ischemia?
    Donati OF; Stolzmann P; Desbiolles L; Leschka S; Kozerke S; Plass A; Wyss C; Falk V; Marincek B; Alkadhi H; Scheffel H
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Oct; 80(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 20708362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [MR angiography and determination of the flow reserve after minimal invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery of the left internal mammary artery in comparison to multirow CT].
    Stauder NI; Stauder H; Fenchel M; Küttner A; Kramer U; Scheule AM; Claussen CD; Miller S
    Rofo; 2005 Aug; 177(8):1094-102. PubMed ID: 16021541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Quantity and quality of graft flow in coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with cardiac computed tomography study-based anatomical and functional parameters.
    Hiraoka A; Fukushima S; Miyagawa S; Yoshikawa Y; Saito S; Domae K; Sakaguchi T; Toda K; Sawa Y
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Nov; 52(5):909-916. PubMed ID: 28977431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Multiple composite grafts (k, π or double-Y) in coronary artery surgery: a choice or a necessity?
    Mannacio V; Cirillo P; Mannacio L; Antignano A; Mottola M; Vosa C
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 20(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 25316687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Value of magnetic resonance imaging for the noninvasive detection of stenosis in coronary artery bypass grafts and recipient coronary arteries.
    Langerak SE; Vliegen HW; Jukema JW; Kunz P; Zwinderman AH; Lamb HJ; van der Wall EE; de Roos A
    Circulation; 2003 Mar; 107(11):1502-8. PubMed ID: 12654607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Fusion of Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Regional Myocardial Strain with Cardiac Computed Tomography for Noninvasive Evaluation of the Hemodynamic Impact of Coronary Stenosis in Patients with Chest Pain.
    Mor-Avi V; Patel MB; Maffessanti F; Singh A; Medvedofsky D; Zaidi SJ; Mediratta A; Narang A; Nazir N; Kachenoura N; Lang RM; Patel AR
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2018 Jun; 31(6):664-673. PubMed ID: 29576220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography in patients after coronary bypass surgery: evaluation of grafts and native coronary arteries.
    Chaosuwannakit N; Makarawate P; Kiatchoosakun S; Wongvipaporn C; Kuptarnond C
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Feb; 97(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 24765901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Combined coronary and perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis.
    Bunce NH; Reyes E; Keegan J; Bunce C; Davies SW; Lorenz CH; Pennell DJ
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2004; 6(2):527-39. PubMed ID: 15137337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts using multi-slice computed tomography: initial clinical experience.
    Burgstahler C; Kuettner A; Kopp AF; Herdeg C; Martensen J; Claussen CD; Schroeder S
    Int J Cardiol; 2003 Aug; 90(2-3):275-80. PubMed ID: 12957762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Impact of specific coronary lesions on regional ischemia at single photon emission computed tomography.
    Nudi F; Schilllaci O; Biondi-Zoccai G; Pinto A; Neri G; Procaccini E; Versaci F; Nudi A; Tomai F; Frati G; Iskandrian AE
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2018 Jul; 19(7):329-336. PubMed ID: 29846303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Probing transmural myocardial perfusion with CMR.
    Klocke FJ; Lee DC
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 24433708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Diagnostic Performance of Treadmill Exercise Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: The Prospective, Multicenter Exercise CMR's Accuracy for Cardiovascular Stress Testing (EXACT) Trial.
    Raman SV; Dickerson JA; Mazur W; Wong TC; Schelbert EB; Min JK; Scandling D; Bartone C; Craft JT; Thavendiranathan P; Mazzaferri EL; Arnold JW; Gilkeson R; Simonetti OP
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 Aug; 5(8):. PubMed ID: 27543308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis by vessel attenuation measurement on CT compared with adenosine perfusion MRI.
    den Dekker MAM; Pelgrim GJ; Pundziute G; van den Heuvel ER; Oudkerk M; Vliegenthart R
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):92-99. PubMed ID: 25467226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Identification of recurrent ischemia after coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison of positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography.
    Marwick TH; Lafont A; Go RT; Underwood DA; Saha GB; MacIntyre WJ
    Int J Cardiol; 1992 Apr; 35(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 1563877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.