These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. A decision tool for predicting sentinel node accuracy from breast tumor size and grade. Coombs N; Chen W; Taylor R; Boyages J Breast J; 2007; 13(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 17983402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical tools in the quest for truth: hypothesis testing, confidence intervals, and the power of clinical studies. Smith SD Ophthalmology; 2008 Mar; 115(3):423-4. PubMed ID: 18319103 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Post hoc power calculations. Wallace DK; Melia M Ophthalmology; 2008 Nov; 115(11):2098; author reply 2098-9. PubMed ID: 19068383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Rethinking orbital imaging establishing guidelines for interpreting orbital imaging studies and evaluating their predictive value in patients with orbital tumors. Ben Simon GJ; Annunziata CC; Fink J; Villablanca P; McCann JD; Goldberg RA Ophthalmology; 2005 Dec; 112(12):2196-207. PubMed ID: 16325712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Diagnostic accuracy]. Simundić AM Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():93-111. PubMed ID: 16526310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Stepwise diagnostic workup in general practice as a consequence of the Bayesian reasoning]. Schneider A; Dinant GJ; Szecsenyi J Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 16686446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Review of null hypothesis significance testing in the ophthalmic literature: are most 'significant' P values false positives? Sanfilippo PG; Casson RJ; Yazar S; Mackey DA; Hewitt AW Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016; 44(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 26140666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is the value of a p value? Grunkemeier GL; Wu Y; Furnary AP Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 87(5):1337-43. PubMed ID: 19379861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Statistical tests: value, principle and interpretation]. Michel R; Ollivier-Gay L; Spiegel A; Boutin JP Med Trop (Mars); 2002; 62(5):561-3. PubMed ID: 12616951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Review on significance debate. Sardu C; Contu P J Prev Med Hyg; 2006 Sep; 47(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 17217189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Tchebysheff! Yet another reason you should NOT use "statistical significance" = a probability < or = .05. Romano PE Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 1998; 13(1):15. PubMed ID: 9852422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. What are the odds? Grunkemeier GL; Wu Y Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Apr; 83(4):1240-4. PubMed ID: 17383319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Beyond the P IV: gain confidence in confidence intervals. Wilhelmus KR J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Dec; 30(12):2618-9. PubMed ID: 15617934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in patients with focal breast pain. Tumyan L; Hoyt AC; Bassett LW Breast J; 2005; 11(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 16174154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Statistical strategies to assess reliability in ophthalmology. Patton N; Aslam T; Murray G Eye (Lond); 2006 Jul; 20(7):749-54. PubMed ID: 16327799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]