These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15519100)

  • 1. Beyond the P: III: Possible insignificance of the nonsignificant P value.
    Wilhelmus KR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2425-6. PubMed ID: 15519100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beyond the P: II: precluding a puddle of P values.
    Wilhelmus KR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Oct; 30(10):2207-8. PubMed ID: 15474837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fletcher's paradox.
    Dammann O; Karmaus W
    Epidemiology; 1992 Nov; 3(6):540-2. PubMed ID: 1420523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A decision tool for predicting sentinel node accuracy from breast tumor size and grade.
    Coombs N; Chen W; Taylor R; Boyages J
    Breast J; 2007; 13(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 17983402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Lies, bloody lies and p-values].
    Kurtzhals JA
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Apr; 165(15):1575-6. PubMed ID: 12715668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical tools in the quest for truth: hypothesis testing, confidence intervals, and the power of clinical studies.
    Smith SD
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Mar; 115(3):423-4. PubMed ID: 18319103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Post hoc power calculations.
    Wallace DK; Melia M
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Nov; 115(11):2098; author reply 2098-9. PubMed ID: 19068383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rethinking orbital imaging establishing guidelines for interpreting orbital imaging studies and evaluating their predictive value in patients with orbital tumors.
    Ben Simon GJ; Annunziata CC; Fink J; Villablanca P; McCann JD; Goldberg RA
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Dec; 112(12):2196-207. PubMed ID: 16325712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The pesty P value.
    Casson RJ
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Dec; 39(9):849-50. PubMed ID: 22128810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Diagnostic accuracy].
    Simundić AM
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():93-111. PubMed ID: 16526310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Stepwise diagnostic workup in general practice as a consequence of the Bayesian reasoning].
    Schneider A; Dinant GJ; Szecsenyi J
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 16686446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review of null hypothesis significance testing in the ophthalmic literature: are most 'significant' P values false positives?
    Sanfilippo PG; Casson RJ; Yazar S; Mackey DA; Hewitt AW
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016; 44(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 26140666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What is the value of a p value?
    Grunkemeier GL; Wu Y; Furnary AP
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 87(5):1337-43. PubMed ID: 19379861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Statistical tests: value, principle and interpretation].
    Michel R; Ollivier-Gay L; Spiegel A; Boutin JP
    Med Trop (Mars); 2002; 62(5):561-3. PubMed ID: 12616951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Review on significance debate.
    Sardu C; Contu P
    J Prev Med Hyg; 2006 Sep; 47(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 17217189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tchebysheff! Yet another reason you should NOT use "statistical significance" = a probability < or = .05.
    Romano PE
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 1998; 13(1):15. PubMed ID: 9852422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What are the odds?
    Grunkemeier GL; Wu Y
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Apr; 83(4):1240-4. PubMed ID: 17383319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beyond the P IV: gain confidence in confidence intervals.
    Wilhelmus KR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Dec; 30(12):2618-9. PubMed ID: 15617934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in patients with focal breast pain.
    Tumyan L; Hoyt AC; Bassett LW
    Breast J; 2005; 11(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 16174154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical strategies to assess reliability in ophthalmology.
    Patton N; Aslam T; Murray G
    Eye (Lond); 2006 Jul; 20(7):749-54. PubMed ID: 16327799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.