These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1551958)

  • 1. Anonymous oocyte donation: a psychological study of recipients, donors and children.
    Raoul-Duval A; Letur-Konirsch H; Frydman R
    Hum Reprod; 1992 Jan; 7(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 1551958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Pregnancy following anonymous oocyte donation: Experience and feelings].
    Guillou J; Séjourné N; Chabrol H
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 May; 37(5):410-4. PubMed ID: 19395302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychiatric issues in non-anonymous oocyte donation. Motivations and expectations of women donors and recipients.
    Bartlett JA
    Psychosomatics; 1991; 32(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 1961858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.
    Bracewell-Milnes T; Saso S; Bora S; Ismail AM; Al-Memar M; Hamed AH; Abdalla H; Thum MY
    Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun; 22(4):450-65. PubMed ID: 27016289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A program for matched, anonymous oocyte donation.
    Kennard EA; Collins RL; Blankstein J; Schover LR; Kanoti G; Reiss J; Quigley MM
    Fertil Steril; 1989 Apr; 51(4):655-60. PubMed ID: 2924932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychological considerations of anonymous oocyte donation.
    Bertrand-Servais M; Letur-Könirsch H; Raoul-Duval A; Frydman R
    Hum Reprod; 1993 Jun; 8(6):874-9. PubMed ID: 8345077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do attitudes toward disclosure in donor oocyte recipients predict the use of anonymous versus directed donation?
    Greenfeld DA; Greenfeld DG; Mazure CM; Keefe DL; Olive DL
    Fertil Steril; 1998 Dec; 70(6):1009-14. PubMed ID: 9848287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of attitudes of donors and recipients to oocyte donation.
    Kirkland A; Power M; Burton G; Baber R; Studd J; Abdalla H
    Hum Reprod; 1992 Mar; 7(3):355-7. PubMed ID: 1587942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Views of donors and recipients regarding disclosure to children following altruistic known oocyte donation.
    Yee S; Blyth E; Tsang AK
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Dec; 23(7):851-9. PubMed ID: 22019613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attitudes about donor information differ greatly between IVF couples using their own gametes and those receiving or donating oocytes or sperm.
    Svanberg AS; Sydsjö G; Bladh M; Lampic C
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jun; 33(6):703-10. PubMed ID: 27059774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attitudes of different groups of women in Sweden to oocyte donation and oocyte research.
    Westlander G; Janson PO; Tägnfors U; Bergh C
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Mar; 77(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 9539279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The attitudes of IVF patients treated in the Czech Republic towards informing children born after gamete donation.
    Rumpikova T; Oborna I; Belaskova S; Konecna H; Rumpik D
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2018 Mar; 162(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 29213142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Children of personalized anonymous oocyte donation. Psychologic aspects].
    Raoul-Duval A; Letur-Konirsch H; Frydman R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1991; 20(3):317-20. PubMed ID: 1869775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychological follow-up of children born after in-vitro fertilization.
    Raoul-Duval A; Bertrand-Servais M; Letur-Könirsch H; Frydman R
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Jun; 9(6):1097-101. PubMed ID: 7962382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Egg donation for stem cell research: ideas of surplus and deficit in Australian IVF patients' and reproductive donors' accounts.
    Waldby C; Carroll K
    Sociol Health Illn; 2012 May; 34(4):513-28. PubMed ID: 21951180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes.
    Solé M; Santaló J; Boada M; Clua E; Rodríguez I; Martínez F; Coroleu B; Barri PN; Veiga A
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2087-92. PubMed ID: 23744895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The donation of oocytes to known recipients.
    Leeton J; Harman J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1987 Aug; 27(3):248-50. PubMed ID: 3435366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Six years' experience in ovum donation using vitrified oocytes: report of cumulative outcomes, impact of storage time, and development of a predictive model for oocyte survival rate.
    Cobo A; Garrido N; Pellicer A; Remohí J
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1426-34.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26353081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Recipients of oocytes donated anonymously. Psychological aspects].
    Bertrand-Servais M; Letur-Könirsch H; Raoul-Duval A; Frydman R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1992; 21(7):743-9. PubMed ID: 1469228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Motivation, attitudes and experience of donation: a follow-up of women donating eggs in assisted conception treatment.
    Fielding D; Handley S; Duqueno L; Weaver S; Lui S
    J Community Appl Soc Psychol; 1998; 8(4):273-87. PubMed ID: 15452938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.