BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15520423)

  • 1. Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis.
    Vasbinder GB; Nelemans PJ; Kessels AG; Kroon AA; Maki JH; Leiner T; Beek FJ; Korst MB; Flobbe K; de Haan MW; van Zwam WH; Postma CT; Hunink MG; de Leeuw PW; van Engelshoven JM;
    Ann Intern Med; 2004 Nov; 141(9):674-82; discussion 682. PubMed ID: 15520423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR angiography, and digital substraction angiography.
    Rountas C; Vlychou M; Vassiou K; Liakopoulos V; Kapsalaki E; Koukoulis G; Fezoulidis IV; Stefanidis I
    Ren Fail; 2007; 29(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 17497443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic angiography and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant transplant renal artery stenosis.
    Gaddikeri S; Mitsumori L; Vaidya S; Hippe DS; Bhargava P; Dighe MK
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014; 43(4):162-8. PubMed ID: 24948209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multidetector-row CT angiography of renal artery stenosis in 50 consecutive patients: prospective interobserver comparison with DSA.
    Fraioli F; Catalano C; Bertoletti L; Danti M; Fanelli F; Napoli A; Cavacece M; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 2006 Apr; 111(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 16683091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Summaries for patients. Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.
    Ann Intern Med; 2004 Nov; 141(9):I66. PubMed ID: 15520418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-invasive imaging cannot replace formal angiography in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension.
    Trautmann A; Roebuck DJ; McLaren CA; Brennan E; Marks SD; Tullus K
    Pediatr Nephrol; 2017 Mar; 32(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 27747454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Renal artery stenosis: comparative evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MRA and DSA.
    Stacul F; Gava S; Belgrano M; Cernic S; Pagnan L; Pozzi Mucelli F; Cova MA
    Radiol Med; 2008 Jun; 113(4):529-46. PubMed ID: 18480971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of Noncontrast Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Lower Extremity MR Angiography Versus CT Angiography for Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease: Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Varga-Szemes A; Wichmann JL; Schoepf UJ; Suranyi P; De Cecco CN; Muscogiuri G; Caruso D; Yamada RT; Litwin SE; Tesche C; Duguay TM; Giri S; Vliegenthart R; Todoran TM
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Oct; 10(10 Pt A):1116-1124. PubMed ID: 28109932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An international multicenter comparison of time-SLIP unenhanced MR angiography and contrast-enhanced CT angiography for assessing renal artery stenosis: the renal artery contrast-free trial.
    Albert TS; Akahane M; Parienty I; Yellin N; Catalá V; Alomar X; Prot A; Tomizawa N; Xue H; Katabathina VS; Lopera JE; Jin Z
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 25539255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noninvasive investigation for renal artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and color Doppler sonography as compared to digital subtraction angiography.
    Voiculescu A; Hofer M; Hetzel GR; Malms J; Mödder U; Grabensee B; Hollenbeck M
    Clin Exp Hypertens; 2001 Oct; 23(7):521-31. PubMed ID: 11710754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography utilizing parallel acquisition techniques in renal artery stenosis detection.
    Slanina M; Zizka J; Klzo L; Lojík M
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e46-50. PubMed ID: 19671492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Renal artery assessment with non-enhanced MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography: comparison between 1.5 and 3.0 T.
    Guo X; Gong Y; Wu Z; Yan F; Ding X; Xu X
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1747-1754. PubMed ID: 31797079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The limitations of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: comparative analysis with conventional arteriography.
    Patel ST; Mills JL; Tynan-Cuisinier G; Goshima KR; Westerband A; Hughes JD
    J Vasc Surg; 2005 Mar; 41(3):462-8. PubMed ID: 15838481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-enhanced MR angiography of renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Angeretti MG; Lumia D; Canì A; Barresi M; Nocchi Cardim L; Piacentino F; Maresca AM; Novario R; Genovese EA; Fugazzola C
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):749-56. PubMed ID: 23550187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Review of source images is necessary for the evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for renal artery stenosis.
    Wehrschuetz M; Aschauer M; Portugaller H; Stix A; Wehrschuetz-Sigl E; Hausegger K; Ebner F
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2004; 27(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 15383846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The diagnostic value of non-contrast enhanced quiescent interval single shot (QISS) magnetic resonance angiography at 3T for lower extremity peripheral arterial disease, in comparison to CT angiography.
    Wu G; Yang J; Zhang T; Morelli JN; Giri S; Li X; Tang W
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Oct; 18(1):71. PubMed ID: 27760564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Renal artery stenosis evaluation: diagnostic performance of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography--comparison with DSA.
    Soulez G; Pasowicz M; Benea G; Grazioli L; Niedmann JP; Konopka M; Douek PC; Morana G; Schaefer FK; Vanzulli A; Bluemke DA; Maki JH; Prince MR; Schneider G; Ballarati C; Coulden R; Wasser MN; McCauley TR; Kirchin MA; Pirovano G
    Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):273-85. PubMed ID: 18372471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.
    Anzidei M; Napoli A; Zaccagna F; Di Paolo P; Saba L; Cavallo Marincola B; Zini C; Cartocci G; Di Mare L; Catalano C; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 2012 Feb; 117(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 21424318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of computed tomography angiography as a complementary test in the assessment of renal artery stenosis: a comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Fleury AS; Durand RE; Cahill AM; Zhu X; Meyers KE; Otero HJ
    Pediatr Radiol; 2021 Dec; 51(13):2507-2520. PubMed ID: 34374838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnosis and outcome of renal function in patients with renal artery stenosis: which role have color Doppler sonography and magnetic resonance angiography?
    Cianci R; Coen G; Manfredini P; Ciano G; Di Donato D; Stivali G; Bianco P; Vitale M; Lavini R
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2006 Feb; 54(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 16467748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.