BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15520689)

  • 1. Skeletal and dental changes in the sagittal, vertical, and transverse dimensions after rapid palatal expansion.
    Chung CH; Font B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Nov; 126(5):569-75. PubMed ID: 15520689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of nitanium maxillary expander appliances on dentofacial structures.
    Karaman AI
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):344-54. PubMed ID: 12169035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cephalometric study of slow maxillary expansion in adults.
    Cao Y; Zhou Y; Song Y; Vanarsdall RL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):348-54. PubMed ID: 19732668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymmetric rapid maxillary expansion in true unilateral crossbite malocclusion: a prospective controlled clinical study.
    Ileri Z; Basciftci FA
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 24963912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Skeletal effects to the maxilla after rapid maxillary expansion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Garrett BJ; Caruso JM; Rungcharassaeng K; Farrage JR; Kim JS; Taylor GD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 18617096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes in the maxillary bone morphology using two-arm maxillary expander.
    Bratu DC; Bratu EA; Popa G; Luca M; Bălan R; Ogodescu A
    Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2012; 53(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 22395497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentoskeletal effects of a removable appliance for expansion of the maxillary arch: a postero-anterior cephalometric study.
    Defraia E; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Tollaro I
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 17971351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
    Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial.
    Liu W; Zhou Y; Wang X; Liu D; Zhou S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):641-51. PubMed ID: 26432320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skeletal and dental changes following surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion.
    Byloff FK; Mossaz CF
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Aug; 26(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 15366385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between rapid and mixed maxillary expansion through an assessment of dento-skeletal effects on posteroanterior cephalometry.
    Perillo L; De Rosa A; Iaselli F; d'Apuzzo F; Grassia V; Cappabianca S
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Jul; 15(1):46. PubMed ID: 25139110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study.
    Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid maxillary expansion. Is it better in the mixed or in the permanent dentition?
    Sari Z; Uysal T; Usumez S; Basciftci FA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):654-61. PubMed ID: 14719729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of rapid palatal expansion on the sagittal and vertical dimensions of the maxilla: a study on cephalograms derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Habeeb M; Boucher N; Chung CH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 23992812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance.
    Bussick TJ; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 10715093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment response to maxillary expansion and protraction.
    Ngan P; Hägg U; Yiu C; Merwin D; Wei SH
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):151-68. PubMed ID: 8670927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of sagittal and vertical effects between bonded rapid and slow maxillary expansion procedures.
    Akkaya S; Lorenzon S; Uçem TT
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Apr; 21(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 10327741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of rapid-slow maxillary expansion on the dentofacial structures.
    Kilic N; Oktay H
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 21175029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of short-term effects of mini-implant-supported maxillary expansion appliance with two conventional expansion protocols.
    Yılmaz A; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Erken S; Polat-Özsoy Ö
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 37(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 25564504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.