These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

21 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15521697)

  • 1. Individuals with and without Visual Impairments Use a Force Feedback Device to Identify the Friction and Hardness of Haptic Surfaces.
    Papadopoulos K; Koustriava E; Georgoula E; Kalpia V
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Roughness of simulated surfaces examined with a haptic tool: effects of spatial period, friction, and resistance amplitude.
    Smith AM; Basile G; Theriault-Groom J; Fortier-Poisson P; Campion G; Hayward V
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 202(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 20012535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors Involved in Tactile Texture Perception through Probes.
    Yoshioka T; Zhou J
    Adv Robot; 2009; 23(6):747-766. PubMed ID: 19617927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Texture perception through direct and indirect touch: an analysis of perceptual space for tactile textures in two modes of exploration.
    Yoshioka T; Bensmaïa SJ; Craig JC; Hsiao SS
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2007; 24(1-2):53-70. PubMed ID: 17558923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Somatosensory coding of roughness: the effect of texture adaptation in direct and indirect touch.
    Hollins M; Lorenz F; Harper D
    J Neurosci; 2006 May; 26(20):5582-8. PubMed ID: 16707809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors contributing to the integration of textural qualities: evidence from virtual surfaces.
    Hollins M; Lorenz F; Seeger A; Taylor R
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2005 Sep; 22(3):193-206. PubMed ID: 16338827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception-based 3D tactile rendering from a single image for human skin examinations by dynamic touch.
    Kim K; Lee S
    Skin Res Technol; 2015 May; 21(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 25087469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subjective scaling of smooth surface friction.
    Smith AM; Scott SH
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 May; 75(5):1957-62. PubMed ID: 8734594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of friction and tangential force variation in the subjective scaling of tactile roughness.
    Smith AM; Chapman CE; Deslandes M; Langlais JS; Thibodeau MP
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):211-23. PubMed ID: 12012159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Importance of Matching Physical Friction, Hardness, and Texture in Creating Realistic Haptic Virtual Surfaces.
    Culbertson H; Kuchenbecker KJ
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2017; 10(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 28328499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Haptic perception of virtual surfaces: scaling subjective qualities and interstimulus differences.
    Hollins M; Seeger A; Pelli G; Taylor R
    Perception; 2004; 33(8):1001-19. PubMed ID: 15521697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multisensory object representation: insights from studies of vision and touch.
    Lacey S; Sathian K
    Prog Brain Res; 2011; 191():165-76. PubMed ID: 21741551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.