645 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15521872)
1. An evaluation of economics and acceptability of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection, in women attending antenatal, abortion, colposcopy and family planning clinics in Scotland, UK.
Norman JE; Wu O; Twaddle S; Macmillan S; McMillan L; Templeton A; McKenzie H; Noone A; Allardice G; Reid M
BJOG; 2004 Nov; 111(11):1261-8. PubMed ID: 15521872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk assessment and other screening options for gonorrhoea and chlamydial infections in women attending rural Tanzanian antenatal clinics.
Mayaud P; Grosskurth H; Changalucha J; Todd J; West B; Gabone R; Senkoro K; Rusizoka M; Laga M; Hayes R
Bull World Health Organ; 1995; 73(5):621-30. PubMed ID: 8846488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnancy; cost-effectiveness favorable at a minimum prevalence rate of 3% or more].
Postma MJ; Bakker A; Welte R; van Bergen JE; van den Hoek JA; de Jong-van den Berg LT; Jager JC
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Dec; 144(49):2350-4. PubMed ID: 11129971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA; Jager JC
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):677-81. PubMed ID: 10321301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors influencing women's views on the acceptability and experience of being opportunistically screened for Chlamydia trachomatis in hospital settings.
McMillan LE; Norman JE; Murray K; Reid ME
Int J STD AIDS; 2006 Dec; 17(12):821-5. PubMed ID: 17212859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A cost-based decision analysis for Chlamydia screening in California family planning clinics.
Trachtenberg AI; Washington AE; Halldorson S
Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jan; 71(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 3122137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening adolescent males for Chlamydia on admission to detention.
Blake DR; Gaydos CA; Quinn TC
Sex Transm Dis; 2004 Feb; 31(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 14743071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness and efficiency of selective vs universal screening for chlamydial infection in sexually active young women.
Sellors JW; Pickard L; Gafni A; Goldsmith CH; Jang D; Mahony JB; Chernesky MA
Arch Intern Med; 1992 Sep; 152(9):1837-44. PubMed ID: 1520050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selective screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in nonurban family planning clinics in Wisconsin.
Addiss DG; Vaughn ML; Holzhueter MA; Bakken LL; Davis JP
Fam Plann Perspect; 1987; 19(6):252-6. PubMed ID: 3436412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in small rural town family planning clinics in the central belt of Scotland.
Sudlow E; Court S; Smith C
Health Bull (Edinb); 2001 Sep; 59(5):332-4. PubMed ID: 12664747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Overestimation of complication rates in evaluations of Chlamydia trachomatis screening programmes--implications for cost-effectiveness analyses.
van Valkengoed IG; Morré SA; van den Brule AJ; Meijer CJ; Bouter LM; Boeke AJ
Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 33(2):416-25. PubMed ID: 15082651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening of Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital infections among the male and female population of the Republic of Macedonia.
Spasovski MS; Simjanovska LJ; Taleski V; Petrova N; Lazetic L; Popeska Z; Gaydos CA; Quinn TC; Efremov GD
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2005 Jul; 19(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 15987287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modelling the impact of opportunistic screening on the sequelae and public healthcare costs of infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in Australian women.
Ward B; Rodger AJ; Jackson TJ
Public Health; 2006 Jan; 120(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 16271271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preventing infective sequelae of abortion.
Penney GC
Hum Reprod; 1997 Nov; 12(11 Suppl):107-12. PubMed ID: 9433966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Universal screening or prophylactic treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women seeking induced abortions: which strategy is more cost-effective?
Chen S; Li J; van den Hoek A
Sex Transm Dis; 2007 Apr; 34(4):230-6. PubMed ID: 17414068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of screening strategies for Gonorrhea among females in private sector care.
Bernstein KT; Mehta SD; Rompalo AM; Erbelding EJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):813-21. PubMed ID: 16582117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of the burden of disease and costs of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Canada.
Tuite AR; Jayaraman GC; Allen VG; Fisman DN
Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Apr; 39(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 22421691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of costs, effectiveness, and disease control of a population-based program using home sampling for diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis Infections.
Andersen B; Gundgaard J; Kretzschmar M; Olsen J; Welte R; Oster-Gaard L
Sex Transm Dis; 2006 Jul; 33(7):407-15. PubMed ID: 16601656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A cost-effectiveness analysis of the Chlamydia Monday--a community-based intervention to decrease the prevalence of chlamydia in Sweden.
Deogan CL; Bocangel MK; Wamala SP; Månsdotter AM
Scand J Public Health; 2010 Mar; 38(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 20064921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis among women attending gynecology and infertility clinics in Gaza, Palestine.
El Qouqa IA; Shubair ME; Al Jarousha AM; Sharif FA
Int J Infect Dis; 2009 May; 13(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 18952476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
