These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15523080)

  • 21. Making research ethics review work in Zimbabwe--the case for investment in local capacity.
    Mielke J; Ndebele P
    Cent Afr J Med; 2004; 50(11-12):115-9. PubMed ID: 16615661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board: lessons learned from developing a multicenter regional institutional review board.
    Saginur R; Dent SF; Schwartz L; Heslegrave R; Stacey S; Manzo J
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Mar; 26(9):1479-82. PubMed ID: 18349399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Regional perspectives in research ethics: a report from Bangladesh.
    Harun-Ar-Rashid
    East Mediterr Health J; 2006; 12 Suppl 1():S66-72. PubMed ID: 17037691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A part of the human genome sequence.
    Venter JC
    Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5610):1183-4. PubMed ID: 12595674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lengthy ethics application process hinders medical research in New Zealand: time for review?
    Horne G
    N Z Med J; 2006 Oct; 119(1244):U2297. PubMed ID: 17072368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Consensus statement on genetic research in dementia.
    Olde Rikkert MG; van der Vorm A; Burns A; Dekkers W; Robert P; Sartorius N; Selmes J; Stoppe G; Vernooij-Dassen M; Waldemar G
    Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen; 2008; 23(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 18509105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [From scientific life. Session "Ethics and Parasitologists"].
    Moskwa B
    Wiad Parazytol; 2004; 50(4):765-74. PubMed ID: 16862817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Debate over institutional review boards continues as alternative options emerge.
    McNeil C
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Apr; 99(7):502-3. PubMed ID: 17405992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Research ethics boards--operational issues I.
    Lynch A
    NCEHR Commun; 1999; 9(2):9-14. PubMed ID: 15540381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Challenges faced by research ethics committees in El Salvador: results from a focus group study.
    Camp JW; Barfield RC; Rodriguez V; Young AJ; Finerman R; Caniza MA
    Dev World Bioeth; 2009 Apr; 9(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 18302541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Putting the "ethics" into "research ethics".
    Spike J
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):51-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Privacy protection and public goods: building a genetic database for health research in Newfoundland and Labrador.
    Kosseim P; Pullman D; Perrot-Daley A; Hodgkinson K; Street C; Rahman P
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2013 Jan; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 22859644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genes for sale.
    Feldman W
    Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1999 Feb; 32(1):5. PubMed ID: 12378738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Protecting groups from genetic research.
    Hausman D
    Bioethics; 2008 Mar; 22(3):157-65. PubMed ID: 18257802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cooperation or co-optation?: Assessing the methodological benefits and barriers involved in conducting qualitative research through medical institutional settings.
    Parnis D; Du Mont J; Gombay B
    Qual Health Res; 2005 May; 15(5):686-97. PubMed ID: 15802543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cooperative research ethics review boards: a win-win solution?
    Koski G; Aungst J; Kupersmith J; Getz K; Rimoin D
    IRB; 2005; 27(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 16021793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Research subject complains about how she was treated by an institutional review board (IRB).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Dec; 20(12):7. PubMed ID: 16607709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The evidence dilemma and cultural change.
    Holtzman NA
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2009; 28(3):925-6; author reply 926-7. PubMed ID: 19414911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Technology: servant or master?
    Warrick HJ
    Hosp Trustee; 1988; 12(3):12-3. PubMed ID: 10287752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reflections on 'Rethinking research ethics'.
    Levine RJ
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):1-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.