These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15523790)

  • 21. Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater--comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment.
    González S; Petrovic M; Barceló D
    Chemosphere; 2007 Feb; 67(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 17123581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Performance comparison of a continuous-flow stirred-tank reactor and an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor for fermentative hydrogen production depending on substrate concentration.
    Kim SH; Han SK; Shin HS
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):23-9. PubMed ID: 16459773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of pentachlorophenol and chemical oxygen demand mass concentrations in influent on operational behaviors of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor.
    Shen DS; He R; Liu XW; Long Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2006 Aug; 136(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 16513261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fate of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) in activated sludge plants.
    Temmink H; Klapwijk B
    Water Res; 2004 Feb; 38(4):903-12. PubMed ID: 14769410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fate of alkylphenolic compounds during activated sludge treatment: impact of loading and organic composition.
    McAdam EJ; Bagnall JP; Soares A; Koh YK; Chiu TY; Scrimshaw MD; Lester JN; Cartmell E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):248-54. PubMed ID: 21128606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Operational strategies for an activated sludge process in conjunction with ozone oxidation for zero excess sludge production during winter season.
    Lee JW; Cha HY; Park KY; Song KG; Ahn KH
    Water Res; 2005 Apr; 39(7):1199-204. PubMed ID: 15862320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Identical full-scale biogas-lift reactors (Blrs) with anaerobic granular sludge and residual activated sludge for brewery wastewater treatment and kinetic modeling.
    Xu F; Huang Z; Miao H; Ren H; Zhao M; Ruan W
    J Environ Sci (China); 2013 Oct; 25(10):2031-40. PubMed ID: 24494489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimization of activated sludge reactor configuration: kinetic considerations.
    Scuras SE; Jobbagy A; Grady CP
    Water Res; 2001 Dec; 35(18):4277-84. PubMed ID: 11763028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Statistical modeling and optimization of biomass granulation and COD removal in UASB reactors treating low strength wastewaters.
    Bhunia P; Ghangrekar MM
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jul; 99(10):4229-38. PubMed ID: 17936620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multi-component kinetics of activated sludge treatment of bleached kraft mill effluent.
    Helle SS; Duff SJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(3):11-20. PubMed ID: 15461394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preliminary studies on continuous chromium(VI) biological removal from wastewater by anaerobic-aerobic activated sludge process.
    Chen Y; Gu G
    Bioresour Technol; 2005 Oct; 96(15):1713-21. PubMed ID: 16023575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prediction of thermal hydrolysis pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge.
    Phothilangka P; Schoen MA; Huber M; Luchetta P; Winkler T; Wett B
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(7):1467-73. PubMed ID: 18957761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Relative efficacy of intrinsic and extant parameters for modeling biodegradation of synthetic organic compounds in activated sludge: steady-state systems.
    Magbanua BS; Smets BF; Bowyer RL; Rodieck AG; Sanders RW; Sowers WW; Stolze SB; Grady CP
    Water Environ Res; 2003; 75(2):126-37. PubMed ID: 12772958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Tracking influent inorganic suspended solids through wastewater treatment plants.
    Ekama GA; Wentzel MC; Sötemann SW
    Water Sci Technol; 2006; 54(8):101-9. PubMed ID: 17163018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biological kinetics evaluation of anaerobic stabilization pond treatment of palm oil mill effluent.
    Wong YS; Kadir MO; Teng TT
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Nov; 100(21):4969-75. PubMed ID: 19560338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates removal in conventional activated sludge systems and membrane bioreactors.
    De Wever H; Van Roy S; Dotremont C; Miller J; Knepper T
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 15497851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimating the removal and biodegradation potential of radiolabeled organic chemicals in activated sludge.
    Shimp RJ; Larson RJ
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1996 Jun; 34(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 8793324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Direct quantification of bacterial biomass in influent, effluent and activated sludge of wastewater treatment plants by using flow cytometry.
    Foladori P; Bruni L; Tamburini S; Ziglio G
    Water Res; 2010 Jul; 44(13):3807-18. PubMed ID: 20537673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Should activated sludge models consider influent seeding of nitrifiers? Field characterization of nitrifying bacteria.
    Jauffur S; Isazadeh S; Frigon D
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 70(9):1526-32. PubMed ID: 25401317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Biomass effects on oxygen transfer in membrane bioreactors.
    Germain E; Nelles F; Drews A; Pearce P; Kraume M; Reid E; Judd SJ; Stephenson T
    Water Res; 2007 Mar; 41(5):1038-44. PubMed ID: 17217981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.