These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15523970)
1. Method of determining a patient's subjective refraction based on objective measurement. Lai S; Gomez N; Wei J J Refract Surg; 2004; 20(5):S528-32. PubMed ID: 15523970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation with visual symptoms, refraction, and topography. Chalita MR; Chavala S; Xu M; Krueger RR Ophthalmology; 2004 Mar; 111(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 15019317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of wavefront aberrations in rabbit and human eyes. Chen L; Huang LC; Gray B; Chernyak DA Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 25069625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction. Lebow KA; Campbell CE Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1191-8. PubMed ID: 25198541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Objective and subjective preoperative refraction techniques for wavefront-optimized and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. Perez-Straziota CE; Randleman JB; Stulting RD J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):256-9. PubMed ID: 19185239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction. Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction? Hastings GD; Marsack JD; Nguyen LC; Cheng H; Applegate RA Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):317-325. PubMed ID: 28370389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy, repeatability, and clinical application of spherocylindrical automated refraction using time-based wavefront aberrometry measurements. Nissman SA; Tractenberg RE; Saba CM; Douglas JC; Lustbader JM Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):577.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16527354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. Tran DB; Sarayba MA; Bor Z; Garufis C; Duh YJ; Soltes CR; Juhasz T; Kurtz RM J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 15721701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Pentacam® AXL Wave provides a reliable wavefront-based objective refraction when compared to manifest subjective refraction: A prospective study. Balparda K; Acevedo-Urrego A; Silva-Quintero LA; Herrera-Chalarca T Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 70(5):1533-1537. PubMed ID: 35502018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of a new binocular wavefront aberrometer based on a self-imaging diffractive sensor. Warden L; Liu Y; Binder PS; Dreher AW; Sverdrup L J Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 24(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 18297944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. LADARWave wavefront measurement in normal eyes. Chalita MR; Finkenthal J; Xu M; Krueger RR J Refract Surg; 2004; 20(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15072312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined corneal topography and corneal wavefront data in the treatment of corneal irregularity and refractive error in LASIK or PRK using the Carl Zeiss Meditec MEL 80 and CRS-Master. Reinstein DZ; Archer TJ; Gobbe M J Refract Surg; 2009 Jun; 25(6):503-15. PubMed ID: 19603618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]