These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15523970)

  • 1. Method of determining a patient's subjective refraction based on objective measurement.
    Lai S; Gomez N; Wei J
    J Refract Surg; 2004; 20(5):S528-32. PubMed ID: 15523970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation with visual symptoms, refraction, and topography.
    Chalita MR; Chavala S; Xu M; Krueger RR
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Mar; 111(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 15019317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of wavefront aberrations in rabbit and human eyes.
    Chen L; Huang LC; Gray B; Chernyak DA
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 25069625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction.
    Lebow KA; Campbell CE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1191-8. PubMed ID: 25198541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objective and subjective preoperative refraction techniques for wavefront-optimized and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Perez-Straziota CE; Randleman JB; Stulting RD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):256-9. PubMed ID: 19185239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
    Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction?
    Hastings GD; Marsack JD; Nguyen LC; Cheng H; Applegate RA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):317-325. PubMed ID: 28370389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy, repeatability, and clinical application of spherocylindrical automated refraction using time-based wavefront aberrometry measurements.
    Nissman SA; Tractenberg RE; Saba CM; Douglas JC; Lustbader JM
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):577.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16527354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeatability and reproducibility of manifest refraction.
    Taneri S; Arba-Mosquera S; Rost A; Kießler S; Dick HB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Dec; 46(12):1659-1666. PubMed ID: 33259390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Tran DB; Sarayba MA; Bor Z; Garufis C; Duh YJ; Soltes CR; Juhasz T; Kurtz RM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 15721701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Pentacam® AXL Wave provides a reliable wavefront-based objective refraction when compared to manifest subjective refraction: A prospective study.
    Balparda K; Acevedo-Urrego A; Silva-Quintero LA; Herrera-Chalarca T
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 70(5):1533-1537. PubMed ID: 35502018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of a new binocular wavefront aberrometer based on a self-imaging diffractive sensor.
    Warden L; Liu Y; Binder PS; Dreher AW; Sverdrup L
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 24(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 18297944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. LADARWave wavefront measurement in normal eyes.
    Chalita MR; Finkenthal J; Xu M; Krueger RR
    J Refract Surg; 2004; 20(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15072312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combined corneal topography and corneal wavefront data in the treatment of corneal irregularity and refractive error in LASIK or PRK using the Carl Zeiss Meditec MEL 80 and CRS-Master.
    Reinstein DZ; Archer TJ; Gobbe M
    J Refract Surg; 2009 Jun; 25(6):503-15. PubMed ID: 19603618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expanded range customcornea algorithms for myopia and astigmatism: one-month results.
    Carones F; Vigo L; Scandola E; Sorace SG
    J Refract Surg; 2004; 20(5):S619-23. PubMed ID: 15523986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design and Clinical Evaluation of a Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
    Durr NJ; Dave SR; Vera-Diaz FA; Lim D; Dorronsoro C; Marcos S; Thorn F; Lage E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1140-7. PubMed ID: 26580271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of manifest refraction between surgeons and optometrists in a clinical refractive surgery practice.
    Reinstein DZ; Yap TE; Carp GI; Archer TJ; Gobbe M;
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 40(3):450-9. PubMed ID: 24581774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of a Smartphone-based Autorefractor Compared with Criterion-standard Refraction.
    Jeganathan VSE; Valikodath N; Niziol LM; Hansen S; Apostolou H; Woodward MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Dec; 95(12):1135-1141. PubMed ID: 30451804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new low-cost, compact, auto-phoropter for refractive assessment in developing countries.
    Amirsolaimani B; Peyman G; Schwiegerling J; Bablumyan A; Peyghambarian N
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):13990. PubMed ID: 29070904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental investigation of accommodation in eyes fit with multifocal contact lenses using a clinical auto-refractor.
    Altoaimi BH; Kollbaum P; Meyer D; Bradley A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):152-163. PubMed ID: 29315718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.