126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15525696)
1. The comparative method rules! Codon volatility cannot detect positive Darwinian selection using a single genome sequence.
Dagan T; Graur D
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Mar; 22(3):496-500. PubMed ID: 15525696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evolutionary genomics: codon volatility does not detect selection.
Chen Y; Emerson JJ; Martin TM
Nature; 2005 Jan; 433(7023):E6-7; discussion E7-8. PubMed ID: 15662371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Codon volatility as an indicator of positive selection: data from eukaryotic genome comparisons.
Friedman R; Hughes AL
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Mar; 22(3):542-6. PubMed ID: 15525698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A dissection of volatility in yeast.
Stoletzki N; Welch J; Hermisson J; Eyre-Walker A
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Oct; 22(10):2022-6. PubMed ID: 15958784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic robustness and selection at the protein level for synonymous codons.
Archetti M
J Evol Biol; 2006 Mar; 19(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 16599911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating selection pressures from limited comparative data.
Plotkin JB; Dushoff J; Desai MM; Fraser HB
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Aug; 23(8):1457-9. PubMed ID: 16754640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Codon volatility does not reflect selective pressure on the HIV-1 genome.
Pillai SK; Kosakovsky Pond SL; Woelk CH; Richman DD; Smith DM
Virology; 2005 Jun; 336(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 15892955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variation in synonymous codon use and DNA polymorphism within the Drosophila genome.
Bierne N; Eyre-Walker A
J Evol Biol; 2006 Jan; 19(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16405571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic robustness at the codon level as a measure of selection.
Archetti M
Gene; 2009 Aug; 443(1-2):64-9. PubMed ID: 19477246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evolutionary genomics: detecting selection needs comparative data.
Nielsen R; Hubisz MJ
Nature; 2005 Jan; 433(7023):E6; discussion E7-8. PubMed ID: 15662372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selective pressures at a codon-level predict deleterious mutations in human disease genes.
Arbiza L; Duchi S; Montaner D; Burguet J; Pantoja-Uceda D; Pineda-Lucena A; Dopazo J; Dopazo H
J Mol Biol; 2006 May; 358(5):1390-404. PubMed ID: 16584746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variation in the pattern of synonymous and nonsynonymous difference between two fungal genomes.
Hughes AL; Friedman R
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 May; 22(5):1320-4. PubMed ID: 15746015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Large-scale analyses of synonymous substitution rates can be sensitive to assumptions about the process of mutation.
Aris-Brosou S; Bielawski JP
Gene; 2006 Aug; 378():58-64. PubMed ID: 16797879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rapid divergence of codon usage patterns within the rice genome.
Wang HC; Hickey DA
BMC Evol Biol; 2007 Feb; 7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S6. PubMed ID: 17288579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Positive Darwinian selection at the pantophysin (Pan I) locus in marine gadid fishes.
Pogson GH; Mesa KA
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jan; 21(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 12949133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selection intensity on preferred codons correlates with overall codon usage bias in Caenorhabditis remanei.
Cutter AD; Charlesworth B
Curr Biol; 2006 Oct; 16(20):2053-7. PubMed ID: 17055986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the evolution of codon volatility.
Zhang J
Genetics; 2005 Jan; 169(1):495-501. PubMed ID: 15466418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Likelihood-based clustering (LiBaC) for codon models, a method for grouping sites according to similarities in the underlying process of evolution.
Bao L; Gu H; Dunn KA; Bielawski JP
Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Sep; 25(9):1995-2007. PubMed ID: 18586695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. False-positive selection identified by ML-based methods: examples from the Sig1 gene of the diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii and the tax gene of a human T-cell lymphotropic virus.
Suzuki Y; Nei M
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 May; 21(5):914-21. PubMed ID: 15014169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Statistical properties of the branch-site test of positive selection.
Yang Z; dos Reis M
Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Mar; 28(3):1217-28. PubMed ID: 21087944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
