141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15526786)
1. Implications of cloning for breed improvement strategies: are traditional methods of animal improvement obsolete?
van Vleck LD
J Anim Sci; 1999; 77 Suppl 2():111-21. PubMed ID: 15526786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Agro-economic impact of cattle cloning.
Faber DC; Ferre LB; Metzger J; Robl JM; Kasinathan P
Cloning Stem Cells; 2004; 6(2):198-207. PubMed ID: 15268796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of selective genotyping strategies for prediction of breeding values in a population undergoing selection.
Boligon AA; Long N; Albuquerque LG; Weigel KA; Gianola D; Rosa GJ
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4716-22. PubMed ID: 23372045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The selection index--then, now, and for the future.
Hazel LN; Dickerson GE; Freeman AE
J Dairy Sci; 1994 Oct; 77(10):3236-51. PubMed ID: 7836610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of marker-assisted selection in animal breeding and biotechnology.
Williams JL
Rev Sci Tech; 2005 Apr; 24(1):379-91. PubMed ID: 16110903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
König S; Swalve HH
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of genotype x environment interaction on genetic gain in breeding programs.
Mulder HA; Bijma P
J Anim Sci; 2005 Jan; 83(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 15583042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Defining multiple-trait objectives for sustainable genetic improvement.
Gibson JP; Wilton JW
J Anim Sci; 1998 Sep; 76(9):2303-7. PubMed ID: 9781486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The value of using DNA markers for beef bull selection in the seedstock sector.
Van Eenennaam AL; van der Werf JH; Goddard ME
J Anim Sci; 2011 Feb; 89(2):307-20. PubMed ID: 21262975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic control of complex traits, with a focus on reproduction in pigs.
Zak LJ; Gaustad AH; Bolarin A; Broekhuijse MLWJ; Walling GA; Knol EF
Mol Reprod Dev; 2017 Sep; 84(9):1004-1011. PubMed ID: 28792084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selection for uniformity in livestock by exploiting genetic heterogeneity of residual variance.
Mulder HA; Bijma P; Hill WG
Genet Sel Evol; 2008; 40(1):37-59. PubMed ID: 18096114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle.
Calus MP; de Haas Y; Pszczola M; Veerkamp RF
Animal; 2013 Feb; 7(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 23031684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Artificial selection and maintenance of genetic variance in the global dairy cow population.
Brotherstone S; Goddard M
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2005 Jul; 360(1459):1479-88. PubMed ID: 16048790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shortcomings of current genetic evaluation systems.
Bourdon RM
J Anim Sci; 1998 Sep; 76(9):2308-23. PubMed ID: 9781487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificial cloning of domestic animals.
Keefer CL
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jul; 112(29):8874-8. PubMed ID: 26195770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic relationships of body composition and feed utilization traits in European whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus L.) and implications for selective breeding in fishmeal- and soybean meal-based diet environments.
Quinton CD; Kause A; Ruohonen K; Koskela J
J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3198-208. PubMed ID: 17709787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic parameters for growth traits for a composite terminal sire breed of sheep.
Mousa E; Van Vleck LD; Leymaster KA
J Anim Sci; 1999 Jul; 77(7):1659-65. PubMed ID: 10438010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Break-even cost of cloning in genetic improvement of dairy cattle.
Dematawewa CM; Berger PJ
J Dairy Sci; 1998 Apr; 81(4):1136-47. PubMed ID: 9594403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genotyping strategies for genomic selection in small dairy cattle populations.
Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
Animal; 2012 Aug; 6(8):1216-24. PubMed ID: 23217224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contribution of semen trait selection, artificial insemination technique, and semen dose to the profitability of pig production systems: A simulation study.
Gonzalez-Pena D; Knox RV; Rodriguez-Zas SL
Theriogenology; 2016 Jan; 85(2):335-44. PubMed ID: 26435262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
