BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15526985)

  • 1. Selection of embryos for day-3 transfer at the pronuclear-stage and pronuclear-stage cryopreservation results in high delivery rates in fresh and frozen cycles.
    Hammitt DG; Sattler CA; Manes ML; Singh AP
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2004 Jul; 21(7):271-8. PubMed ID: 15526985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retrospective analysis of outcomes following transfer of previously cryopreserved oocytes, pronuclear zygotes and supernumerary blastocysts.
    Hodes-Wertz B; Noyes N; Mullin C; McCaffrey C; Grifo JA
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Jul; 23(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 21550305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Freeze-all: enhanced outcomes with cryopreservation at the blastocyst stage versus pronuclear stage using slow-freeze techniques.
    Surrey E; Keller J; Stevens J; Gustofson R; Minjarez D; Schoolcraft W
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Sep; 21(3):411-7. PubMed ID: 20638905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of pregnancy outcome of pronuclear- and multicellular-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers.
    Kattera S; Shrivastav P; Craft I
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1999 Aug; 16(7):358-62. PubMed ID: 10459518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. No advantage of fresh blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer in women under the age of 39: a randomized controlled study.
    Levi-Setti PE; Cirillo F; Smeraldi A; Morenghi E; Mulazzani GEG; Albani E
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Mar; 35(3):457-465. PubMed ID: 29168022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Successful pregnancy resulting from cryopreserved pronuclear and cleaved embryos thawed and cultured to blastocysts, refrozen and transferred. A case report.
    Estes SJ; Laky DC; Hoover LM; Smith SE; Schinfeld JS; Somkuti SG
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Jan; 48(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 12611095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chromosome analysis of blastocysts derived from single pronuclear zygotes by array CGH and clinical outcomes by the transfer of single pronuclear zygotes.
    Hirata K; Goto S; Izumi Y; Taguchi M; Hayashi A; Fujioka M; Ishiko A; Nakanishi K; Kimura F; Murakami T
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Jul; 37(7):1645-1652. PubMed ID: 32415641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A flexible protocol for cryopreservation of pronuclear and cleavage stage embryos created by conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Amarin ZO
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Dec; 117(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15541856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Value of transferring embryos that show no evidence of fertilization at the time of fertilization assessment.
    Li M; Lin S; Chen Y; Zhu J; Liu P; Qiao J
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Sep; 104(3):607-11.e2. PubMed ID: 26049055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Embryo cryopreservation at the pronuclear stage and efficient embryo use optimizes the chance for a liveborn infant from a single oocyte retrieval.
    Damario MA; Hammitt DG; Session DR; Dumesic DA
    Fertil Steril; 2000 Apr; 73(4):767-73. PubMed ID: 10731539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro development and implantation rates of fresh and cryopreserved sibling zygotes.
    Miller KF; Goldberg JM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 85(6):999-1002. PubMed ID: 7770273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of pronuclear morphology on embryo quality parameters and blastocyst transfer outcome.
    Balaban B; Urman B; Isiklar A; Alatas C; Aksoy S; Mercan R; Mumcu A; Nuhoglu A
    Hum Reprod; 2001 Nov; 16(11):2357-61. PubMed ID: 11679520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fresh transfer outcome predicts the success of a subsequent frozen transfer utilizing blastocysts of the same cohort.
    Doherty LF; Martin JR; Kayisli U; Sakkas D; Patrizio P
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Feb; 28(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 24365019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of oocyte cryopreservation on embryo development.
    Magli MC; Lappi M; Ferraretti AP; Capoti A; Ruberti A; Gianaroli L
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):510-6. PubMed ID: 19342025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].
    Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers.
    Guerif F; Lemseffer M; Bidault R; Gasnier O; Saussereau MH; Cadoret V; Jamet C; Royere D
    Hum Reprod; 2009 May; 24(5):1051-8. PubMed ID: 19218575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of insemination technique, semen quality and oocyte cryopreservation on pronuclear morphology of zygotes derived from sibling oocytes.
    Nicoli A; Capodanno F; Valli B; Di Girolamo R; Villani MT; Nucera A; Focarelli R; La Sala GB
    Zygote; 2010 Feb; 18(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 19500447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed blastocysts derived from non-pronucleus or two pronucleus zygotes].
    Ma SY; Li C; Zhao HB; Zhang JY; Zhang HZ; Wu KL; Li M
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Nov; 53(11):749-754. PubMed ID: 30453421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
    Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization.
    Min JK; Hughes E; Young D; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):363-377. PubMed ID: 20500945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.