These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15528099)

  • 1. Improving permutation test power for group analysis of spatially filtered MEG data.
    Chau W; McIntosh AR; Robinson SE; Schulz M; Pantev C
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):983-96. PubMed ID: 15528099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A cluster mass permutation test with contextual enhancement for fMRI activation detection.
    Tillikainen L; Salli E; Korvenoja A; Aronen HJ
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):654-64. PubMed ID: 16769226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of random field theory and permutation methods for the statistical analysis of MEG data.
    Pantazis D; Nichols TE; Baillet S; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(2):383-94. PubMed ID: 15784416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An integrative MEG-fMRI study of the primary somatosensory cortex using cross-modal correspondence analysis.
    Schulz M; Chau W; Graham SJ; McIntosh AR; Ross B; Ishii R; Pantev C
    Neuroimage; 2004 May; 22(1):120-33. PubMed ID: 15110002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrated MEG and fMRI model: synthesis and analysis.
    Babajani A; Nekooei MH; Soltanian-Zadeh H
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 16341578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Partial least squares analysis of neuroimaging data: applications and advances.
    McIntosh AR; Lobaugh NJ
    Neuroimage; 2004; 23 Suppl 1():S250-63. PubMed ID: 15501095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data.
    Maris E; Oostenveld R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Aug; 164(1):177-90. PubMed ID: 17517438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Permutation testing made practical for functional magnetic resonance image analysis.
    Belmonte M; Yurgelun-Todd D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Mar; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 11341714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rank-order versus mean based statistics for neuroimaging.
    Rorden C; Bonilha L; Nichols TE
    Neuroimage; 2007 May; 35(4):1531-7. PubMed ID: 17391987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Random field-union intersection tests for EEG/MEG imaging.
    Carbonell F; Galán L; Valdés P; Worsley K; Biscay RJ; Díaz-Comas L; Bobes MA; Parra M
    Neuroimage; 2004 May; 22(1):268-76. PubMed ID: 15110017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combining voxel intensity and cluster extent with permutation test framework.
    Hayasaka S; Nichols TE
    Neuroimage; 2004 Sep; 23(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 15325352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatiotemporal Bayesian inference dipole analysis for MEG neuroimaging data.
    Jun SC; George JS; Paré-Blagoev J; Plis SM; Ranken DM; Schmidt DM; Wood CC
    Neuroimage; 2005 Oct; 28(1):84-98. PubMed ID: 16023866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time-frequency discriminant analysis of MEG signals.
    Ho MH; Ombao H; Edgar JC; Cañive JM; Miller GA
    Neuroimage; 2008 Mar; 40(1):174-86. PubMed ID: 18158254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cortical oscillatory power changes during auditory oddball task revealed by spatially filtered magnetoencephalography.
    Ishii R; Canuet L; Herdman A; Gunji A; Iwase M; Takahashi H; Nakahachi T; Hirata M; Robinson SE; Pantev C; Takeda M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 120(3):497-504. PubMed ID: 19138878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multivariate source prelocalization (MSP): use of functionally informed basis functions for better conditioning the MEG inverse problem.
    Mattout J; Pélégrini-Issac M; Garnero L; Benali H
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jun; 26(2):356-73. PubMed ID: 15907296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Data-driven parceling and entropic inference in MEG.
    Lapalme E; Lina JM; Mattout J
    Neuroimage; 2006 Mar; 30(1):160-71. PubMed ID: 16426867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Volumetric estimation of functional brain regions in small children using spatially filtered magnetoencephalography: differentiating thumb from middle finger.
    Xiang J; Holowka S; Qiao H; Sun B; Chuang S
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():110. PubMed ID: 16012596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of subjective affective state from brain activations.
    Rolls ET; Grabenhorst F; Franco L
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1294-308. PubMed ID: 19109452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of false discovery rates for wavelet-denoised statistical parametric maps.
    Srikanth R; Casanova R; Laurienti PJ; Peiffer AM; Maldjian JA
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 33(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 16919480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multimodal integration of EEG, MEG and fMRI data for the solution of the neuroimage puzzle.
    Babiloni F; Mattia D; Babiloni C; Astolfi L; Salinari S; Basilisco A; Rossini PM; Marciani MG; Cincotti F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1471-6. PubMed ID: 15707796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.